The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Five years later: a cross‐sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women
Open accessAbstract
Although a number of studies have focused on initial adjustment to cancer, less is known about long‐term survival issues. The present study compared breast cancer survivors with age‐matched healthy controls (N=328) in terms of more subtle indicators of psychological well‐being as well as their general quality of life 5 yrs post‐diagnosis. Results indicated survivors generally perceive the world as less controllable and more random compared to healthy women. However, survivors perceive the same control over their daily lives as healthy women. Beliefs about personal control are most strongly associated with quality of life in both groups of women. Survivors also indicated that they derived some benefits from their experience with cancer, but these benefits had only a modest impact on quality of life. However, the belief that the experience had lasting harmful effects was associated with poor quality of life for survivors. In both groups, a continued search for meaning in life had a negative impact on quality of life. The strongest and most consistent correlate of quality of life for both survivors and healthy women was having a sense of purpose in life. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide
Ware, J. (2003) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,424
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
(1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,156
(1992) · Cited by 3,325
Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.
Taylor, S. E. (1983) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.38.11.1161 · Cited by 3,051
The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells, K. B. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.262.7.914 · Cited by 2,808
Lerner, M. J. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5 · Cited by 2,656
The Functioning and Well-being of Depressed Patients: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells, K. B. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430070062031 · Cited by 2,130 · cited 1×
“This instrument has excellent reliability and validity and has been used to evaluate functional status in depressed, chronically ill, and healthy populations (Wells et al., 1989).”
Assumptive Worlds and the Stress of Traumatic Events: Applications of the Schema Construct
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.113 · Cited by 1,757
Cited by
Park, C. L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018301 · Cited by 3,174
Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: A systematic review
Mols, F., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., Coebergh, J. W., & van de Poll-Franse, L. V. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.05.017 · Cited by 585
Is Finding Something Good in the Bad Always Good? Benefit Finding Among Women With Breast Cancer.
Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.16 · Cited by 589
Self-citationSeiler, A., & Jenewein, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00208 · Cited by 473
Depression, quality of life and breast cancer: a review of the literature
Reich, M., Lesur, A., & Perdrizet-Chevallier, C. (2008) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9706-5 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 154-169
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2079099445
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Five years later: a cross‐sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.570
- The paper
- Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Five years later: a cross‐sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.