Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Five years later: a cross‐sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women

Open access
Tomich, Patriciav L., Helgeson, Vicki S.·2002·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Although a number of studies have focused on initial adjustment to cancer, less is known about long‐term survival issues. The present study compared breast cancer survivors with age‐matched healthy controls (N=328) in terms of more subtle indicators of psychological well‐being as well as their general quality of life 5 yrs post‐diagnosis. Results indicated survivors generally perceive the world as less controllable and more random compared to healthy women. However, survivors perceive the same control over their daily lives as healthy women. Beliefs about personal control are most strongly associated with quality of life in both groups of women. Survivors also indicated that they derived some benefits from their experience with cancer, but these benefits had only a modest impact on quality of life. However, the belief that the experience had lasting harmful effects was associated with poor quality of life for survivors. In both groups, a continued search for meaning in life had a negative impact on quality of life. The strongest and most consistent correlate of quality of life for both survivors and healthy women was having a sense of purpose in life. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.570

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
154-169
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2079099445
Cited by
349
References
49
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Five years later: a cross‐sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.570
The paper
Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Five years later: a cross‐sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.570

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.