The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review
Open accessAbstract
An overview is provided of research into the return to work of cancer survivors, examining both the rate of return to work and factors impacting this return. A series of literature searches was conducted on MEDLINE and PSYCLIT databases for the years 1985–1999. Studies had to focus on the patient's perspective and had to include either the percentage of return to work or factors associated with return to work. Case studies and studies of cancer as an occupational disease were excluded. The search identified 14 studies. The mean rate of return to work was 62% (range 30–93%). The following factors were negatively associated with return to work: a non‐supportive work environment, manual labour, and having head and neck cancer. Sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with return to work. For increasing age, associations were mixed. The increased survival rate of cancer patients warrants attention to the problems survivors may encounter upon their return to work. More systematic research is needed to establish more clearly the relative importance of factors associated with return to work of cancer survivors, which, in turn, would contribute to an increase in the labour‐participation of cancer survivors. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Duijts, S. F. A., van Egmond, M. P., Spelten, E., van Muijen, P., Anema, J. R., & van der Beek, A. J. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3467 · Cited by 356
Self-citationCorrelates of Return to Work for Breast Cancer Survivors
Bouknight, R. R., Bradley, C. J., & Luo, Z. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.00.4929 · Cited by 355
Employment challenges for cancer survivors
Mehnert, A., de Boer, A., & Feuerstein, M. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28067 · Cited by 304
Willems, R. A., Bolman, C. A. W., Mesters, I., Kanera, I. M., Beaulen, A. A. J. M., & Lechner, L. (2016) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3870 · Cited by 122
Importance of physical appearance in patients with skin cancer
Sobanko, J. F., Sarwer, D. B., Zvargulis, Z., & Miller, C. J. (2015) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000000253 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Spelten, E. R., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Verbeek, J. H. A. M.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-131
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2069600965
- Cited by
- 581
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.585
- The paper
- Spelten, E. R., Sprangers, M. A. G., & Verbeek, J. H. A. M. (2002). Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.