The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The psychosocial needs of breast cancer survivors; A qualitative study of the shared and unique needs of younger versus older survivors
Abstract
Due to improvements in medical treatment and survival following breast cancer, researchers have turned their attention to investigating the needs of breast cancer survivors. There is disagreement about the extent to which survivors continue to experience psychological morbidity after treatment ends. Whilst the majority of women adjust well to breast cancer, some may have continued psychosocial needs. Available research suggests that younger pre‐menopausal women are at increased risk of psychological morbidity following breast cancer. The present study aimed to gather preliminary qualitative data on the psychosocial needs of breast cancer survivors and to identify the shared and unique needs of younger versus older survivors. A qualitative methodology was chosen as this was a relatively unexplored area of enquiry. Patients treated for early‐stage breast cancer who had completed their hospital‐based treatment 6–24 months prior to participation were recruited. Sampling was discontinued when informational redundancy was achieved. Eighteen telephone interviews were conducted. A wide variety of on‐going psychosocial and information needs were reported by breast cancer survivors including support needs, psychological needs, practical needs, physical needs and information needs. Younger women reported more needs than their older counterparts. Several needs reported by younger women were directly related to being of younger age or pre‐menopausal at the time of diagnosis. Clinical implications are discussed. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Cited by
Risk Factors for Chronic Pain Following Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Study
Poleshuck, E. L., Katz, J., Andrus, C. H., Hogan, L. A., Jung, B. F., Kulick, D. I., & Dworkin, R. H. (2006) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2006.02.007 · Cited by 555
Mehnert, A., & Koch, U. (2008) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.12.005 · Cited by 473
Mindfulness meditation for younger breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial
Bower, J. E., Crosswell, A. D., Stanton, A. L., Crespi, C. M., Winston, D., Arevalo, J., Ma, J., Cole, S. W., & Ganz, P. A. (2015) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29194 · Cited by 390
Risk factors for acute pain and its persistence following breast cancer surgery
Katz, J., Poleshuck, E. L., Andrus, C. H., Hogan, L. A., Jung, B. F., Kulick, D. I., & Dworkin, R. H. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.008 · Cited by 363
Breast cancer survivors' supportive care needs 2–10 years after diagnosis
Hodgkinson, K., Butow, P., Hunt, G. E., Pendlebury, S., Hobbs, K. M., & Wain, G. (2007) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0170-2 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thewes, B., Butow, P., Girgis, A., & Pendlebury, S.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 177-189
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2064224628
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The psychosocial needs of breast cancer survivors; A qualitative study of the shared and unique needs of younger versus older survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.710
- The paper
- Thewes, B., Butow, P., Girgis, A., & Pendlebury, S. (2004). The psychosocial needs of breast cancer survivors; A qualitative study of the shared and unique needs of younger versus older survivors. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.