Cited by 244Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementFamily Support in Illness

Coping responses following breast cancer diagnosis predict psychological adjustment three years later

Hack, Thomas F., Degner, Lesley F.·2004·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

The relationship between coping responses and psychological adjustment to a breast cancer diagnosis is well documented for time periods close to diagnosis. The purpose of the present study was to assess the long term association between these two variables. Fifty-five women completed measures of coping response, decisional control, frustration expression, and psychological adjustment within six months of receiving their breast cancer diagnosis. These women were contacted three years later and their psychological adjustment-as measured by the profile of mood states (POMS)-was reassessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The results showed that women who were depressed at time of treatment planning, and who responded to their cancer diagnosis with cognitive avoidance, i.e. acceptance/resignation, had significantly worse psychological adjustment three years later. Poor adjustment was significantly associated with cognitive avoidance and minimal use of approach-based coping responses. The findings suggest that women who respond to their breast cancer diagnosis with passive acceptance and resignation are at significant risk for poor long term psychological adjustment. Psychological interventions for these women should address cognitive avoidance, with the aim of fostering approach-based coping and positive well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.739

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 244

Authors
Hack, T. F., & Degner, L. F.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Hack, Thomas F.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-03
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
235-247
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2168537699
Cited by
244
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
breast cancer, coping responses, psychological adjustment, long-term adjustment, cognitive avoidance, depression, decisional control, Profile of Mood States, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Attitude to Health, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review