Coping responses following breast cancer diagnosis predict psychological adjustment three years later
Abstract
The relationship between coping responses and psychological adjustment to a breast cancer diagnosis is well documented for time periods close to diagnosis. The purpose of the present study was to assess the long term association between these two variables. Fifty-five women completed measures of coping response, decisional control, frustration expression, and psychological adjustment within six months of receiving their breast cancer diagnosis. These women were contacted three years later and their psychological adjustment-as measured by the profile of mood states (POMS)-was reassessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The results showed that women who were depressed at time of treatment planning, and who responded to their cancer diagnosis with cognitive avoidance, i.e. acceptance/resignation, had significantly worse psychological adjustment three years later. Poor adjustment was significantly associated with cognitive avoidance and minimal use of approach-based coping responses. The findings suggest that women who respond to their breast cancer diagnosis with passive acceptance and resignation are at significant risk for poor long term psychological adjustment. Psychological interventions for these women should address cognitive avoidance, with the aim of fostering approach-based coping and positive well-being.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inefficacy of avoidance as a coping strategy in cancer patients is marked by a huge amount of research.
“Inefficacy of avoidance as a coping strategy in cancer patients, is marked by a huge amount of research (21,22) .”
From Aceptación de miedos a la recaída en pacientes con cáncer de mama: efectos de una intervención abreviada basada en la ACT (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 244
- Authors
- Hack, T. F., & Degner, L. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hack, Thomas F.
- ORCID
- Hack, Thomas F.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 235-247
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2168537699
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
- Keywords
- breast cancer, coping responses, psychological adjustment, long-term adjustment, cognitive avoidance, depression, decisional control, Profile of Mood States, psychological intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Attitude to Health, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Cluster Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review