Cited by 126Cancer survivorship and careFamily Support in IllnessGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Depressive symptoms after lung cancer surgery: Their relation to coping style and social support

Walker, Mark S., Zona, Denise M., Fisher, Edwin B.·2006·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Lung cancer patients may experience greater emotional distress than patients with other cancers. Studies have shown social support to predict adjustment in other cancers, but findings among lung cancer patients have been equivocal. Coping style has been shown to predict distress among lung cancer patients, but has not been examined in the context of social support. We examined coping style and social support as predictors of depressive symptoms one week after surgery among 119 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The Beck Depression Inventory was the primary outcome measure. Predictors included age, ECOG performance status, stage of disease, and measures of adaptive coping, less adaptive coping, Directive instrumental social support and Nondirective instrumental social support. Results indicated that 29% of lung cancer patients had scores above a standard cutoff for clinically significant depression. Results also showed that depressive symptoms were directly related to use of less adaptive coping methods and Directive instrumental social support, inversely related to age and use of adaptive coping methods, and unrelated to nondirective social support, stage of disease and performance status. Results extend previous findings by showing that adaptive coping methods are related to severity of distress, and that the benefits of social support may depend on the characteristics of that support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.997

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 126

Authors
Walker, M. S., Zona, D. M., & Fisher, E. B.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Walker, Mark S.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-22
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
684-693
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2022506065
Cited by
126
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (5 RO1 CA85920-03, R01CA085920)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
depressive symptoms, lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, coping styles, social support, instrumental support, adaptive coping, Beck Depression Inventory
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Personality Tests, Postoperative Complications, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review