Exploring the impact of a maternal support grant to improve mental health and food security amongst pregnant women in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
Social protection during pregnancy may support pregnant women struggling to meet basic needs to ensure a healthy pregnancy and buffer negative impacts of multiple adversities. We assessed the effect of a bimonthly digital food voucher, delivered to pregnant women during the COVID‐19 pandemic in the Cape Town area, on their mental health, hunger, and dietary diversity. Pregnant women from antenatal clinics in specific high‐poverty areas were invited to join the voucher program; a subset was recruited for in‐depth telephone interviews. Interviews were conducted before, during, and after voucher distribution. Generalized estimating equations were fit to examine whether each outcome was associated with voucher exposure over time. Of the 205 participants, most were aged 25–34, not recently employed, with at least one child in their household. Approximately 1/3 were first‐time mothers and 32% reported mental health difficulties. Voucher exposure over 12 months was associated with significant reductions in mental health symptoms at midline and endline. Maternal hunger was reduced at midline and endline. High mental health scores were significantly associated with increased maternal hunger after adjusting for potential confounders. This study provides preliminary evidence for income support during pregnancy to shape positive health outcomes in South Africa.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings highlight the influential role of poverty-related risk factors, including unemployment, deprivation, disempowerment, and food insecurity, in shaping maternal mental health and subjectivities.
“The findings highlight the influential role of poverty-related risk factors, including unemployment, deprivation, disempowerment, and food insecurity, in shaping maternal mental health and subjectivities (22, 65).”
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
Connor, J., Madhavan, S., Mokashi, M., Amanuel, H., Johnson, N. R., Pace, L. E., & Bartz, D. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113364 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Picchioni, F., Goulao, L. F., & Roberfroid, D. (2022) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.08.015 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Enhancing the clinical utility of depression screening
Kroenke, K. (2012) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.112004 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Torres, N. F., Watson, D., Mohlomi, L., Hlungwani, T., Gardiner, C. V., Muller-Kluits, N., Norris, S. A., Draper, C. E., & Pentecost, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Global Women's Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2026.1880613
- Authors
- Laurenzi, C. A., Menyatsoe, M., Shuaib, M., Edwards, A., Gemmell, K., Geffen, H., Tomlinson, M., Müller, A., Manda, S., & Mabaso, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- Grow Great Campaign, DG Murray Trust Midrand South Africa
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- DG Murray Trust Claremont South Africa
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Laurenzi, Christina A.
- Venue
- Poverty & Public Policy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 232-252
- ISSN
- 1944-2858 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402194315
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Poverty & Public Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
- Keywords
- social protection, pregnant women, maternal mental health, food security, hunger, dietary diversity, COVID-19 pandemic, income support, poverty, Cape Town
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review