Cited by 2Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Exploring the impact of a maternal support grant to improve mental health and food security amongst pregnant women in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Laurenzi, Christina A., Menyatsoe, Masedi, Shuaib, Mustafa, Edwards, Amanda, Gemmell, Kelly, Geffen, Hayli, Tomlinson, Mark, Müller, Anna‐Marie +2 more·2024·Poverty & Public Policy

Abstract

Social protection during pregnancy may support pregnant women struggling to meet basic needs to ensure a healthy pregnancy and buffer negative impacts of multiple adversities. We assessed the effect of a bimonthly digital food voucher, delivered to pregnant women during the COVID‐19 pandemic in the Cape Town area, on their mental health, hunger, and dietary diversity. Pregnant women from antenatal clinics in specific high‐poverty areas were invited to join the voucher program; a subset was recruited for in‐depth telephone interviews. Interviews were conducted before, during, and after voucher distribution. Generalized estimating equations were fit to examine whether each outcome was associated with voucher exposure over time. Of the 205 participants, most were aged 25–34, not recently employed, with at least one child in their household. Approximately 1/3 were first‐time mothers and 32% reported mental health difficulties. Voucher exposure over 12 months was associated with significant reductions in mental health symptoms at midline and endline. Maternal hunger was reduced at midline and endline. High mental health scores were significantly associated with increased maternal hunger after adjusting for potential confounders. This study provides preliminary evidence for income support during pregnancy to shape positive health outcomes in South Africa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pop4.408

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laurenzi, C. A., Menyatsoe, M., Shuaib, M., Edwards, A., Gemmell, K., Geffen, H., Tomlinson, M., Müller, A., Manda, S., & Mabaso, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Grow Great Campaign, DG Murray Trust Midrand South Africa
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • DG Murray Trust Claremont South Africa
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Laurenzi, Christina A.
Venue
Poverty & Public Policy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
232-252
ISSN
1944-2858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402194315
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Poverty & Public Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
social protection, pregnant women, maternal mental health, food security, hunger, dietary diversity, COVID-19 pandemic, income support, poverty, Cape Town

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review