The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of high flow nasal cannula therapy on the work of breathing in infants with bronchiolitis
Abstract
Summary: The main physiological impact of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is presumed to be a decrease in work of breathing (WOB). To assess this, diaphragmatic electrical activity and esophageal pressure changes were measured off then on HFNC delivered at 2 L/kg/min, in 14 infants with bronchiolitis and 14 cardiac infants. Electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) was measured using an Edi catheter with calculations of signal peak (Edi MAX ) and amplitude (Edi AMPL ). Pressure–rate and pressure–time products (PRP, PTP) were calculated from analyses of esophageal pressure. Changes in end‐expiratory lung volume were measured using respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP EEL ). The Edi MAX and Edi AMPL were significantly higher in infants with bronchiolitis than in cardiac infants ( P < 0.05). Within the bronchiolitis group, both were significantly reduced between HFNC states from 27.9 µV [20.4, 35.4] to 21.0 µV [14.8, 27.2] and from 25.1 µV [18.0, 32.2] to 19.2 µV [13.3, 25.1], respectively (mean, 95% CI, P < 0.05). A less prominent offload of the diaphragm was observed in cardiac infants ( P < 0.05). WOB decreased in both groups with a significant reduction of PRP and PTP ( P < 0.05). RIP EEL increased significantly in bronchiolitis only ( P < 0.05). HFNC offloads the diaphragm and reduces the WOB in bronchiolitis. A similar effect was demonstrated in cardiac infants, a group without signs of airway‐obstruction. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015; 50:713–720. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-Flow Oxygen through Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Frat, J.-P., Thille, A. W., Mercat, A., Girault, C., Ragot, S., Perbet, S., Prat, G., Boulain, T., Morawiec, E., Cottereau, A., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1503326 · Cited by 2,342
Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Mauri, T., Turrini, C., Eronia, N., Grasselli, G., Volta, C. A., Bellani, G., & Pesenti, A. (2017) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201605-0916oc · Cited by 641
Milési, C., Essouri, S., Pouyau, R., Liet, J.-M., Afanetti, M., Portefaix, A., Baleine, J., Durand, S., Combes, C., Douillard, A., et al. (2017) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4617-8 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Pham, T. M. T., O'Malley, L., Mayfield, S., Martin, S., & Schibler, A.
- Venue
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-21
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 713-720
- ISSN
- 1099-0496 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-6863
- OpenAlex
- W1488062931
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of high flow nasal cannula therapy on the work of breathing in infants with bronchiolitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ppul.23060
- The paper
- Pham, T. M. T., O'Malley, L., Mayfield, S., Martin, S., & Schibler, A. (2015). The effect of high flow nasal cannula therapy on the work of breathing in infants with bronchiolitis. Pediatric Pulmonology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.23060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.