Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From Digitization and Images to Text and Content: Transkribus as a Case Study

Prebor, Gila·2023·Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
DOI 10.1002/pra2.958
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This poster explores the potential of using technological tools, specifically the Transkribus platform, for the transcription of Hebrew manuscripts. The digitization of historical resources has made them accessible, but the textual content of the scanned images remains inaccessible. Transkribus, an AI‐powered platform, offers tools for text recognition, transcription, and search of historical documents. The poster discusses the process of automatic text recognition (ATR) and the challenges it faces, particularly in handling handwritten texts and Hebrew letters. It provides an overview of the Transkribus platform, its functionalities, and the training process for creating transcription models. The author presents a case study of transcribing a 15th‐century Sephardic semi‐cursive Hebrew manuscript using the Transkribus platform and evaluates the performance of different models. The poster concludes by discussing the implications and possibilities of using Transkribus for automatic transcription of historical Hebrew manuscripts. While the results show promising improvements in accuracy, further challenges and solutions are also discussed. Overall, Transkribus offers significant potential for the study and transcription of Hebrew manuscripts, revolutionizing the field of Jewish studies and historical research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pra2.958

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 1 Example of transcription of the Sefer ha-Iqqarim manuscript, Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, MS hébreu 740, fol. 19r, using the DiJeSt model.
Figure 1 Example of transcription of the Sefer ha-Iqqarim manuscript, Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, MS hébreu 740, fol. 19r, using the DiJeSt model.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 3 Example of a transcription of BnF MS hébreu 740, fol. 15v, using the BnF 740 model.
Figure 3 Example of a transcription of BnF MS hébreu 740, fol. 15v, using the BnF 740 model.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 5 The learning curve of Heb_Sefaradic_Semi_Cursive_15 yielded a CER of 0.43 percent on the training set and of 2.96 percent on the test set after fifty epochs (training sessions) of training, meaning that there was fewer than one incorrectly transcribed character for every one hundred characters.
Figure 5 The learning curve of Heb_Sefaradic_Semi_Cursive_15 yielded a CER of 0.43 percent on the training set and of 2.96 percent on the test set after fifty epochs (training sessions) of training, meaning that there was fewer than one incorrectly transcribed character for every one hundred characters.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 7 Example of transcription of BnF MS hébreu 740, fol. 26v, using Heb_Sefaradic_ Semi_Cursive_15 model.
Figure 7 Example of transcription of BnF MS hébreu 740, fol. 26v, using Heb_Sefaradic_ Semi_Cursive_15 model.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 8 Example of transcription of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Poc. 393, fol. 11r, using Heb_Sefaradic_Semi_Cursive_15.
Figure 8 Example of transcription of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Poc. 393, fol. 11r, using Heb_Sefaradic_Semi_Cursive_15.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 10
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 10 Comparison of the transcription of the Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Poc. 393, fol. 19v, using the Oxford_393 model and the corrected text.
Figure 10 Comparison of the transcription of the Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Poc. 393, fol. 19v, using the Oxford_393 model and the corrected text.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1109/ICCICCT.2014.6993174 · DOI
  2. 10.46298/jdmdh.6249 · DOI
  3. 10.1108/JD-07-2018-0114 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Prebor, G.
Affiliations
Bar Ilan University Israel
Venue
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-10
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
1102-1103
ISSN
2373-9231
DOI
10.1002/pra2.958
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 21 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.