The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Of problems and opportunities—How to treat and how to not treat crystallographic fragment screening data
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
In their recent commentary in Protein Science, Jaskolski et al . analyzed three randomly picked diffraction data sets from fragment‐screening group depositions from the PDB and, based on that, they claimed that such data are principally problematic. We demonstrate here that if such data are treated properly, none of the proclaimed criticisms persist.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1002/pro.4271 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky949 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/0889311X.2016.1155050 · DOI
- 10.3791/62414 · DOI
- Wollenhaupt J, 2021, Workflow and tools for crystallographic fragment screening at the Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin, J Vis Exp, 2021, 1
- 10.1107/S205979832000889X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2016.06.010 · DOI
- 10.1021/acschembio.5b01034 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2020.04.019 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-18709-w · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.abf8711 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms15123 · DOI
- 10.1107/S1600576716004416 · DOI
- 10.1107/S2059798317003412 · DOI
- 10.1038/80215 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, M. S., Wollenhaupt, J., Correy, G. J., Fraser, J. S., Heine, A., Klebe, G., Krojer, T., Thunissen, M., & Pearce, N. M.
- Affiliations
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (DE)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- Lund University (SE)
- MAX IV Laboratory Lund University Lund Sweden
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Weiss, Manfred S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-08-29
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e4391-e4391
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC9424839
- OpenAlex
- W4293535521
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HZB Repository (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH (HZB)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Diamond Light Source
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (VI.Veni.192.143)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Crystal structures of chemical compounds
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
- Keywords
- crystallographic fragment screening, data quality, protein structure determination, data deposition, Protein Data Bank
- MeSH terms
- Ligands, Proteins, Crystallography, X-Ray
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
