Cited by 24Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Assessing and enhancing foldability in designed proteins

Open access
Listov, Dina, Lipsh‐Sokolik, Rosalie, Rosset, Stéphane, Yang, Che, Correia, Bruno E., Fleishman, Sarel Jacob·2022·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Recent advances in protein‐design methodology have led to a dramatic increase in reliability and scale. With these advances, dozens and even thousands of designed proteins are automatically generated and screened. Nevertheless, the success rate, particularly in design of functional proteins, is low and fundamental goals such as reliable de novo design of efficient enzymes remain beyond reach. Experimental analyses have consistently indicated that a major reason for design failure is inaccuracy and misfolding relative to the design conception. To address this challenge, we describe complementary methods to diagnose and ameliorate suboptimal regions in designed proteins: first, we develop a Rosetta atomistic computational mutation scanning approach to detect energetically suboptimal positions in designs (available on a web server https://pSUFER.weizmann.ac.il ); second, we demonstrate that AlphaFold2 ab initio structure prediction flags regions that may misfold in designed enzymes and binders; and third, we focus FuncLib design calculations on suboptimal positions in a previously designed low‐efficiency enzyme, improving its catalytic efficiency by 330‐fold. Furthermore, applied to a de novo designed protein that exhibited limited stability, the same approach markedly improved stability and expressibility. Thus, foldability analysis and enhancement may dramatically increase the success rate in design of functional proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4400

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Listov, D., Lipsh‐Sokolik, R., Rosset, S., Yang, C., Correia, B. E., & Fleishman, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Fleishman, Sarel Jacob
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-08-13
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
e4400-e4400
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4291197726
Cited by
24
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • H2020 European Research Council (716058, 815379)
  • Israel Science Foundation (1844/19)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (310030_163139)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein design, foldability, de novo protein design, misfolding, mutation scanning, AlphaFold2, ab initio structure prediction, enzyme catalytic efficiency, protein stability, protein binders
MeSH terms
Catalysis, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review