Assessing and enhancing foldability in designed proteins
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Recent advances in protein‐design methodology have led to a dramatic increase in reliability and scale. With these advances, dozens and even thousands of designed proteins are automatically generated and screened. Nevertheless, the success rate, particularly in design of functional proteins, is low and fundamental goals such as reliable de novo design of efficient enzymes remain beyond reach. Experimental analyses have consistently indicated that a major reason for design failure is inaccuracy and misfolding relative to the design conception. To address this challenge, we describe complementary methods to diagnose and ameliorate suboptimal regions in designed proteins: first, we develop a Rosetta atomistic computational mutation scanning approach to detect energetically suboptimal positions in designs (available on a web server https://pSUFER.weizmann.ac.il ); second, we demonstrate that AlphaFold2 ab initio structure prediction flags regions that may misfold in designed enzymes and binders; and third, we focus FuncLib design calculations on suboptimal positions in a previously designed low‐efficiency enzyme, improving its catalytic efficiency by 330‐fold. Furthermore, applied to a de novo designed protein that exhibited limited stability, the same approach markedly improved stability and expressibility. Thus, foldability analysis and enhancement may dramatically increase the success rate in design of functional proteins.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808 · see citing works
Computational Design of Proteins Targeting the Conserved Stem Region of Influenza Hemagglutinin
Fleishman, S. J., Whitehead, T. A., Ekiert, D. C., Dreyfus, C., Corn, J. E., Strauch, E.-M., Wilson, I. A., & Baker, D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1202617 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Self-citationMassively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics
Chevalier, A., Silva, D.-A., Rocklin, G. J., Hicks, D. R., Vergara, R., Murapa, P., Bernard, S. M., Zhang, L., Lam, K.-H., Yao, G., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23912 · Cited by 453 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent advances in protein design methodology extend its scope to the design of large proteins that are highly mutated relative to natural ones(25) and to sets comprising thousands of designs.(3,14) Nevertheless, the success rate is typically low and some critical goals remain elusive.”
BackgroundLapidoth, G. D., Baran, D., Pszolla, G. M., Norn, C., Alon, A., Tyka, M. D., & Fleishman, S. J. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24779 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Bottom-up de novo design of functional proteins with complex structural features
Yang, C., Sesterhenn, F., Bonet, J., van Aalen, E. A., Scheller, L., Abriata, L. A., Cramer, J. T., Wen, X., Rosset, S., Georgeon, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-020-00699-x · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De novo protein design by inversion of the <scp>AlphaFold</scp> structure prediction network
Goverde, C. A., Wolf, B., Khakzad, H., Rosset, S., & Correia, B. E. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4653 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Listov, D., Lipsh‐Sokolik, R., Rosset, S., Yang, C., Correia, B. E., & Fleishman, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Fleishman, Sarel Jacob
- ORCID
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-08-13
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e4400-e4400
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC9375437
- OpenAlex
- W4291197726
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- H2020 European Research Council (716058, 815379)
- Israel Science Foundation (1844/19)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (310030_163139)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- protein design, foldability, de novo protein design, misfolding, mutation scanning, AlphaFold2, ab initio structure prediction, enzyme catalytic efficiency, protein stability, protein binders
- MeSH terms
- Catalysis, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review