Cited by 4Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

A structural database of chain–chain and domain–domain interfaces of proteins

Open access
Sen, Neeladri, Madhusudhan, Mallur S.·2022·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In this study, we mined the PDB and created a structural library of 178,465 interfaces that mediate protein–protein/domain–domain interactions. Interfaces involving the same CATH fold(s) were clustered together. Our analysis of the library reveals similarities between chain–chain and domain–domain interactions. The library also illustrates how a single protein fold can interact with multiple folds using similar interfaces. The library is hence a useful resource to study the types of interactions between protein folds. Analyzing the data in the library reveals various interesting aspects of protein–protein and domain–domain interactions such as how proteins belonging to folds that interact with many other folds also have high number of Enzyme Commission terms. These data could be utilized to seek potential binding partners. It can also be utilized to investigate the different ways in which two or more folds interact with one another structurally. We constructed a statistical potential of pair preferences of amino acids across the interface for chain–chain and domain–domain interactions separately. They are quite similar further lending credence to the notion that domain–domain interfaces could be used to study chain–chain interactions. We analyzed protein complexes modeled by AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold and noticed that some of the modes of interaction involve folds and interfaces that have not been observed to bind in the PDB. Lastly and importantly, the library includes predicted small molecule‐binding sites at protein–protein interfaces. This has applications as interfaces containing small molecule‐binding sites can be easily targeted to prevent the interaction and perhaps form a part of a therapeutic strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4406

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sen, N., & Madhusudhan, M. S.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IN)
Corresponding author
Madhusudhan, Mallur S.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-08-13
Volume
31
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4291214695
Cited by
4
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
  • The Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, domain-domain interactions, interchain interactions, protein interfaces, structural database, protein complexes, AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, small molecule binding sites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review