Cited by 12Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchRNA Research and SplicingProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fused in sarcoma undergoes cold denaturation: Implications for phase separation

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The mediation of liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) for fused in sarcoma (FUS) protein is generally attributed to the low‐complexity, disordered domains and is enhanced at low temperature. The role of FUS folded domains on the LLPS process remains relatively unknown since most studies are mainly based on fragmented FUS domains. Here, we investigate the effect of metabolites on full‐length (FL) FUS LLPS using turbidity assays and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy, and explore the behavior of the folded domains by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. FL FUS LLPS is maximal at low concentrations of glucose and glutamate, moderate concentrations of NaCl, Zn 2+ , and Ca 2+ and at the isoelectric pH. The FUS RNA recognition motif (RRM) and zinc‐finger (ZnF) domains are found to undergo cold denaturation above 0°C at a temperature that is determined by the conformational stability of the ZnF domain. Cold unfolding exposes buried nonpolar residues that can participate in LLPS‐promoting hydrophobic interactions. Therefore, these findings constitute the first evidence that FUS globular domains may have an active role in LLPS under cold stress conditions and in the assembly of stress granules, providing further insight into the environmental regulation of LLPS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4521

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1021/bi00010a019 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.01.019 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s10858-013-9737-7 · DOI
  4. 10.1042/BJ20060166 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.242746499 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/bi00268a033 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)42942-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nrm.2017.7 · DOI
  9. 10.1074/jbc.M111.328757 · DOI
  10. 10.7554/eLife.69377 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/hmg/ddq335 · DOI
  12. 10.1083/jcb.201308087 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.1172046 · DOI
  14. 10.4161/15476286.2014.972208 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.020 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.006 · DOI
  17. 10.3390/molecules24081622 · DOI
  18. 10.15252/embj.201593517 · DOI
  19. 10.1039/C6SM01837H · DOI
  20. 10.1002/pmic.201700193 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.78 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005941 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/emboj.2010.143 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1504822112 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.010 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41598-021-89075-w · DOI
  27. 10.1091/mbc.E12-04-0296 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.038 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000327 · DOI
  30. 10.3390/biom9020071 · DOI
  31. Keller R, 2004, Optimizing the process of nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum analysis and computer aided resonance assignment
  32. 10.1126/science.1166066 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.04.009 · DOI
  34. Kroschwald S, 2017, Hexanediol: a chemical probe to investigate the material properties of membrane‐less compartments, Matters, 3, e201702000010
  35. 10.1038/nature10879 · DOI
  36. 10.1083/jcb.201302044 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.018 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.012 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/ja803280e · DOI
  40. 10.1186/s12964-015-0125-7 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.015 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.030 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.048 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/pro.5560041020 · DOI
  45. Onuchic PL, 2019, Divalent cations can control a switch‐like behavior in heterotypic and homotypic RNA coacervates, Sci Rep, 91, 1
  46. 10.3109/10409237509102551 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.047 · DOI
  48. 10.3109/10409239009090612 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.05.004 · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016957 · DOI
  51. Rogelj B, 2012, RNA binding proteins, 59
  52. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01141 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/1759091414544472 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/cphc.201500765 · DOI
  55. 10.2174/092986709787458506 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1007/s12035-009-8087-7 · DOI
  58. 10.1021/ja908104s · DOI
  59. 10.1126/science.aaf4382 · DOI
  60. 10.1074/jbc.AC120.013166 · DOI
  61. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00510 · DOI
  62. 10.3390/molecules22091429 · DOI
  63. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01088 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s00249-005-0028-4 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.11.028 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.006 · DOI
  68. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0359 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.040 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/s42004-018-0011-5 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.06.003 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.003 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00081-4 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Félix, S. S., Laurents, D. V., Oroz, J., & Cabrita, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Corresponding author
  • Oroz, Javier
  • Cabrita, Eurico J.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-12-19
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
e4521-e4521
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4310572064
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Foundation for Science and Technology (LA/P/0140/2020, PD/BD/148028/2019, ROTEIRO/0031/2013‐PINFRA/22161/2016, UIDP/04378/2020, UIDB/04378/2020)
  • BBVA Foundation (BBM_TRA_0203)
  • Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, PID‐2019‐109276RA‐I00, PID‐2019‐109306RB‐I00, RYC2018‐026042‐I)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
FUS protein, liquid-liquid phase separation, cold denaturation, RNA recognition motif, zinc finger, stress granules, low-complexity domains, hydrophobic interactions, protein conformational stability
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Sarcoma, Temperature, Zinc Fingers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review