Cited by 9Protein Structure and DynamicsLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorEnzyme Structure and Function

Modeling membrane geometries implicitly in Rosetta

Open access
Woods, Hope, Leman, Julia Koehler, Meiler, Jens·2024·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Interactions between membrane proteins (MPs) and lipid bilayers are critical for many cellular functions. In the Rosetta molecular modeling suite, the implicit membrane energy function is based on a “slab” model, which represent the membrane as a flat bilayer. However, in nature membranes often have a curvature that is important for function and/or stability. Even more prevalent, in structural biology research MPs are reconstituted in model membrane systems such as micelles, bicelles, nanodiscs, or liposomes. Thus, we have modified the existing membrane energy potentials within the RosettaMP framework to allow users to model MPs in different membrane geometries. We show that these modifications can be utilized in core applications within Rosetta such as structure refinement, protein–protein docking, and protein design. For MP structures found in curved membranes, refining these structures in curved, implicit membranes produces higher quality models with structures closer to experimentally determined structures. For MP systems embedded in multiple membranes, representing both membranes results in more favorable scores compared to only representing one of the membranes. Modeling MPs in geometries mimicking the membrane model system used in structure determination can improve model quality and model discrimination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4908

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Woods, H., Leman, J. K., & Meiler, J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Flatiron Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Meiler, Jens
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-02-15
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
e4908-e4908
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4391847155
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM129261)
  • Simons Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
membrane proteins, lipid bilayer curvature, bicelles, nanodiscs, liposomes, protein-lipid interactions, structure refinement, protein-protein docking, protein design, membrane reconstitution
MeSH terms
Lipid Bilayers, Liposomes, Membrane Proteins, Micelles, Models, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review