Cited by 12Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thermo Link: Bridging disulfide bonds and enzyme thermostability through database construction and machine learning prediction

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Disulfide bonds, covalently formed by sulfur atoms in cysteine residues, play a crucial role in protein folding and structure stability. Considering their significance, artificial disulfide bonds are often introduced to enhance protein thermostability. Although an increasing number of tools can assist with this task, significant amounts of time and resources are often wasted owing to inadequate consideration. To enhance the accuracy and efficiency of designing disulfide bonds for protein thermostability improvement, we initially collected disulfide bond and protein thermostability data from extensive literature sources. Thereafter, we extracted various sequence‐ and structure‐based features and constructed machine‐learning models to predict whether disulfide bonds can improve protein thermostability. Among all models, the neighborhood context model based on the Adaboost‐DT algorithm performed the best, yielding “area under the receiver operating characteristic curve” and accuracy scores of 0.773 and 0.714, respectively. Furthermore, we also found AlphaFold2 to exhibit high superiority in predicting disulfide bonds, and to some extent, the coevolutionary relationship between residue pairs potentially guided artificial disulfide bond design. Moreover, several mutants of imine reductase 89 (IR89) with artificially designed thermostable disulfide bonds were experimentally proven to be considerably efficient for substrate catalysis. The SS‐bond data have been integrated into an online server, namely, ThermoLink, available at guolab.mpu.edu.mo/thermoLink .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.5097

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129475 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.06.004 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1186/1471-2105-14-S19-S1 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0167-7799(00)88896-4 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/proeng/gzg024 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg231 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.05.020 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/nbt0804-1035 · DOI
  12. EvansR O'NeillM PritzelA AntropovaN SeniorA GreenT et al.Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold‐multimer.BioRxiv.2021https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.03.011 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41598-020-67230-z · DOI
  16. 10.1002/cctc.201901369 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00138 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03364.x · DOI
  19. HongL SunS ZhengL TanQ LiY.fastMSA: accelerating multiple sequence alignment with dense retrieval on protein language.BioRxiv.2021https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/21/2021.12.20.473431
  20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty862 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.062 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.1614437114 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01138-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/acscatal.3c02575 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11274-017-2365-8 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04798 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113786 · DOI
  28. 10.1155/2015/370756 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TCBB.2019.2952102 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/pro.5560031207 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/acscatal.9b04321 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/febs.12530 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168155 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s00894-014-2106-y · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0167-7799(98)01204-9 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nbt1206-1565 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/TCBB.2019.2911071 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s12010-020-03249-2 · DOI
  40. Pedregosa F, 2011, Scikit‐learn: machine learning in python, J Mach Learn Res, 12, 2825
  41. 10.1039/c3sm50807b · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s12010-009-8735-4 · DOI
  43. 10.1039/D1AY00802A · DOI
  44. 10.17849/insm-47-01-31-39.1 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/acscatal.1c03753 · DOI
  46. Schomburg D, 2010, Humana Press, 113
  47. 10.1093/nar/gki387 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/263476a0 · DOI
  49. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00099 · DOI
  50. 10.1109/TCBB.2014.2366126 · DOI
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkz385 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/biot.201400150 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/protein/gzx014 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/prot.26573 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/s40708-017-0065-7 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1002/bab.2117 · DOI
  57. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa701 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224 · DOI
  59. 10.1093/nar/gki402 · DOI
  60. 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01618 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.12.001 · DOI
  62. 10.1080/10408398.2021.1970508 · DOI
  63. Xing R, 2024, Systems microbiology and biomanufacturing, 1
  64. 10.1371/journal.pone.0126864 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.012 · DOI
  66. 10.1039/D2CY00082B · DOI
  67. 10.1002/adsc.202200361 · DOI
  68. Zheng L, 2022, Structure prediction of the entire proteome of monkeypox variants, Acta Mater Med, 1, 260
  69. 10.2323/jgam.62.83 · DOI
  70. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.815990 · DOI
  71. 10.1002/jcc.21433 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Xu, R., Pan, Q., Zhu, G., Ye, Y., Xin, M., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Li, W., Wei, Y., Guo, J., & Zheng, L.
Affiliations
  • Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
  • Xiamen Innovax Biotech Co., Ltd. (China) (CN)
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Guo, Jingjing
  • Zheng, Liangzhen
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-08-15
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
e5097-e5097
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4401616221
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFA0915500)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62272449)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
protein thermal stability, disulfide bond prediction, AlphaFold2
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Disulfides, Enzyme Stability, Models, Molecular, Protein Folding, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review