A coarse‐grained model for disordered and multi‐domain proteins
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Many proteins contain more than one folded domain, and such modular multi‐domain proteins help expand the functional repertoire of proteins. Because of their larger size and often substantial dynamics, it may be difficult to characterize the conformational ensembles of multi‐domain proteins by simulations. Here, we present a coarse‐grained model for multi‐domain proteins that is both fast and provides an accurate description of the global conformational properties in solution. We show that the accuracy of a one‐bead‐per‐residue coarse‐grained model depends on how the interaction sites in the folded domains are represented. Specifically, we find excessive domain–domain interactions if the interaction sites are located at the position of the C α atoms. We also show that if the interaction sites are located at the center of mass of the residue, we obtain good agreement between simulations and experiments across a wide range of proteins. We then optimize our previously described CALVADOS model using this center‐of‐mass representation, and validate the resulting model using independent data. Finally, we use our revised model to simulate phase separation of both disordered and multi‐domain proteins, and to examine how the stability of folded domains may differ between the dilute and dense phases. Our results provide a starting point for understanding interactions between folded and disordered regions in proteins, and how these regions affect the propensity of proteins to self‐associate and undergo phase separation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 127 · Cited by 134
- Authors
- Cao, F., von Bülow, S., Tesei, G., & Lindorff‐Larsen, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Structural Biology and NMR Laboratory & the Linderstrøm‐Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Corresponding author
- Lindorff‐Larsen, Kresten
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-10-16
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e5172-e5172
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC11481261
- OpenAlex
- W4403460892
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 18.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- European Molecular Biology Organization
- China Scholarship Council
- Novo Nordisk Fonden
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- coarse-grained models, multidomain proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, domain-domain interactions, protein phase separation, protein self-association, protein conformational ensembles, protein folding stability
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review