The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topology prediction for helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy–Topology prediction at 86% accuracy
Open accessAbstract
Previously, we introduced a neural network system predicting locations of transmembrane helices (HTMs) based on evolutionary profiles (PHDhtm, Rost B, Casadio R, Fariselli P, Sander C, 1995, Protein Sci 4:521–533). Here, we describe an improvement and an extension of that system. The improvement is achieved by a dynamic programming‐like algorithm that optimizes helices compatible with the neural network output. The extension is the prediction of topology (orientation of first loop region with respect to membrane) by applying to the refined prediction the observation that positively charged residues are more abundant in extra‐cytoplasmic regions. Furthermore, we introduce a method to reduce the number of false positives, i.e., proteins falsely predicted with membrane helices. The evaluation of prediction accuracy is based on a cross‐validation and a double‐blind test set (in total 131 proteins). The final method appears to be more accurate than other methods published: (1) For almost 89% (π3%) of the test proteins, all HTMs are predicted correctly. (2) For more than 86% (π3%) of the proteins, topology is predicted correctly. (3) We define reliability indices that correlate with prediction accuracy: for one half of the proteins, segment accuracy raises to 98%; and for two‐thirds, accuracy of topology prediction is 95%. (4) The rate of proteins for which HTMs are predicted falsely is below 2% (π1%). Finally, the method is applied to 1,616 sequences of Haemophilus influenzae. We predict 19% of the genome sequences to contain one or more HTMs. This appears to be lower than what we predicted previously for the yeast VIII chromosome (about 25%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein
Kyte, J., & Doolittle, R. F. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · Cited by 22,843
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures
Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Meyer, E. F., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., & Tasumi, M. (1977) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3 · Cited by 8,578
Whole-Genome Random Sequencing and Assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd
Fleischmann, R. D., Adams, M. D., White, O., Clayton, R. A., Kirkness, E. F., Kerlavage, A. R., Bult, C. J., Tomb, J.-F., Dougherty, B. A., Merrick, J. M., et al. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7542800 · Cited by 5,654
A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites
von Heijne, G. (1986) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/14.11.4683 · Cited by 4,508
Deisenhofer, J., Epp, O., Miki, K., Huber, R., & Michel, H. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/318618a0 · Cited by 3,068
Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy
Henderson, R., Baldwin, J. M., Ceska, T. A., Zemlin, F., Beckmann, E., & Downing, K. H. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80271-2 · Cited by 2,980
Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure at Better than 70% Accuracy
Rost, B., & Sander, C. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1413 · Cited by 2,910
Self-citationAnalysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot
Eisenberg, D., Schwarz, E., Komaromy, M., & Wall, R. (1984) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(84)90309-7 · Cited by 2,284
Cited by
Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · Cited by 12,654
The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server
Tusnády, G. E., & Simon, I. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.849 · Cited by 1,907
Rost, B., Yachdav, G., & Liu, J. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh377 · Cited by 1,453
Self-citationTusnády, G. E., & Simon, I. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2107 · Cited by 1,079
The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides
Tsirigos, K. D., Peters, C., Shu, N., Käll, L., & Elofsson, A. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv485 · Cited by 936
Metadata
- Authors
- Rost, B., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1704-1718
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W1526754730
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topology prediction for helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy–Topology prediction at 86% accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.5560050824
- The paper
- Rost, B., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R. (1996). Topology prediction for helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy–Topology prediction at 86% accuracy. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560050824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.