Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 607

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Topology prediction for helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy–Topology prediction at 86% accuracy

Open access
Rost, Burkhard, Fariselli, Piero, Casadio, Rita·1996·Protein Science

Abstract

Previously, we introduced a neural network system predicting locations of transmembrane helices (HTMs) based on evolutionary profiles (PHDhtm, Rost B, Casadio R, Fariselli P, Sander C, 1995, Protein Sci 4:521–533). Here, we describe an improvement and an extension of that system. The improvement is achieved by a dynamic programming‐like algorithm that optimizes helices compatible with the neural network output. The extension is the prediction of topology (orientation of first loop region with respect to membrane) by applying to the refined prediction the observation that positively charged residues are more abundant in extra‐cytoplasmic regions. Furthermore, we introduce a method to reduce the number of false positives, i.e., proteins falsely predicted with membrane helices. The evaluation of prediction accuracy is based on a cross‐validation and a double‐blind test set (in total 131 proteins). The final method appears to be more accurate than other methods published: (1) For almost 89% (π3%) of the test proteins, all HTMs are predicted correctly. (2) For more than 86% (π3%) of the proteins, topology is predicted correctly. (3) We define reliability indices that correlate with prediction accuracy: for one half of the proteins, segment accuracy raises to 98%; and for two‐thirds, accuracy of topology prediction is 95%. (4) The rate of proteins for which HTMs are predicted falsely is below 2% (π1%). Finally, the method is applied to 1,616 sequences of Haemophilus influenzae. We predict 19% of the genome sequences to contain one or more HTMs. This appears to be lower than what we predicted previously for the yeast VIII chromosome (about 25%).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.5560050824

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 607

Metadata

Authors
Rost, B., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-08
Volume
5
Issue
8
Pages
1704-1718
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W1526754730
Cited by
607
References
60
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topology prediction for helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy–Topology prediction at 86% accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.5560050824
The paper
Rost, B., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R. (1996). Topology prediction for helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy–Topology prediction at 86% accuracy. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560050824

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.