The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side‐chain rotamer preferences
Open accessAbstract
We present a Bayesian statistical analysis of the conformations of side chains in proteins from the Protein Data Bank. This is an extension of the backbone‐dependent rotamer library, and includes rotamer populations and average x angles for a full range of ø,ψ values. The Bayesian analysis used here provides a rigorous statistical method for taking account of varying amounts of data. Bayesian statistics requires the assumption of a prior distribution for parameters over their range of possible values. This prior distribution can be derived from previous data or from pooling some of the present data. The prior distribution is combined with the data to form the posterior distribution , which is a compromise between the prior distribution and the data. For the X 2 , X 3 , and X 4 rotamer prior distributions, we assume that the probability of each rotamer type is dependent only on the previous X rotamer in the chain. For the backbone‐dependence of the x 1 rotamers, we derive prior distributions from the product of the ø‐dependent and ψ‐dependent probabilities. Molecular mechanics calculations with the CHARMM22 potential show a strong similarity with the experimental distributions, indicating that proteins attain their lowest energy rotamers with respect to local backbone‐side‐chain interactions. The new library is suitable for use in homology modeling, protein folding simulations, and the refinement of X‐ray and NMR structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Cited by
The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design
Alford, R. F., Leaver-Fay, A., Jeliazkov, J. R., O’Meara, M. J., DiMaio, F. P., Park, H., Shapovalov, M. V., Renfrew, P. D., Mulligan, V. K., Kappel, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · Cited by 1,532
Self-citationShapovalov, M. V., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.03.019 · Cited by 1,000
Self-citationConsistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data
Shen, Y., Lange, O., Delaglio, F., Rossi, P., Aramini, J. M., Liu, G., Eletsky, A., Wu, Y., Singarapu, K. K., Lemak, A., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800256105 · Cited by 855
RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): a general framework for computational antibody design
Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Kalyuzhniy, O., Kubitz, M., Weitzner, B. D., Hu, X., Adachi, Y., Schief, W. R., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112 · Cited by 227
Self-citationRosettaAntibody: antibody variable region homology modeling server
Sircar, A., Kim, E. T., & Gray, J. J. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp387 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunbrack, R. L., & Cohen, F. E.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1661-1681
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2164130591
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.