Cited by 0Genomics and Rare DiseasesProtein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

AFFIPred : AlphaFold2 structure‐based Functional Impact Prediction of missense variations

Open access
Pir, Mustafa S, Timucin, Emel·2025·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein structure holds immense potential for pathogenicity prediction, albeit structure‐based predictors are limited compared to the sequence‐based counterparts due to the “structure knowledge gap” between large number of available protein sequences and relatively limited number of structures. Leveraging the highly accurate protein structures predicted by AlphaFold2 (AF2), we introduce AFFIPred, an ensemble machine learning classifier that combines sequence and AF2‐based structural characteristics to predict missense variant pathogenicity. Based on the assessments on unseen datasets, AFFIPred reached a comparable level of performance with the state‐of‐the‐art predictors such as AlphaMissense. We also showed that the recruitment of AF2 structures that are full‐length and represent the unbound states ensures more precise SASA calculations compared to the recruitment of experimental structures. In line with the completeness of the AF2 structures, their use provide a more comprehensive view of the structural characteristics of the missense variation datasets by capturing all variants. AFFIPred maintains high‐level accuracy without the limitations of PDB‐based classifiers. AFFIPred has predicted over 210 million variations of the human proteome, which are accessible at https://affipred.timucinlab.com/ .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.70030

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 70

Authors
Pir, M. S., & Timucin, E.
Affiliations
  • Acıbadem University (TR)
  • Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Health Sciences Acibadem University Atasehir Istanbul Turkey
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-01-22
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
e70030-e70030
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4406702706
Cited by
0
References
70
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure-based prediction, solvent accessibility, protein structure prediction, human proteome, functional impact prediction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Computational Biology, Mutation, Missense, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review