AFFIPred : AlphaFold2 structure‐based Functional Impact Prediction of missense variations
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Protein structure holds immense potential for pathogenicity prediction, albeit structure‐based predictors are limited compared to the sequence‐based counterparts due to the “structure knowledge gap” between large number of available protein sequences and relatively limited number of structures. Leveraging the highly accurate protein structures predicted by AlphaFold2 (AF2), we introduce AFFIPred, an ensemble machine learning classifier that combines sequence and AF2‐based structural characteristics to predict missense variant pathogenicity. Based on the assessments on unseen datasets, AFFIPred reached a comparable level of performance with the state‐of‐the‐art predictors such as AlphaMissense. We also showed that the recruitment of AF2 structures that are full‐length and represent the unbound states ensures more precise SASA calculations compared to the recruitment of experimental structures. In line with the completeness of the AF2 structures, their use provide a more comprehensive view of the structural characteristics of the missense variation datasets by capturing all variants. AFFIPred maintains high‐level accuracy without the limitations of PDB‐based classifiers. AFFIPred has predicted over 210 million variations of the human proteome, which are accessible at https://affipred.timucinlab.com/ .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 70
- Authors
- Pir, M. S., & Timucin, E.
- Affiliations
- Acıbadem University (TR)
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Health Sciences Acibadem University Atasehir Istanbul Turkey
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-01-22
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e70030-e70030
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC11751861
- OpenAlex
- W4406702706
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- AlphaFold2, protein structure-based prediction, solvent accessibility, protein structure prediction, human proteome, functional impact prediction
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Computational Biology, Mutation, Missense, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review