Cited by 1Protein Structure and DynamicsProtein purification and stabilityEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the sequence and structural determinants of the energy landscape from thermodynamically stable and kinetically trapped subtilisins: ISP1 and SbtE

Open access
Hood, Miriam R., Marqusee, Susan·2025·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A protein's energy landscape, all accessible conformations, their populations, and dynamics of interconversion, is encoded in its primary sequence. While how this sequence encodes a protein's native state is well understood, how it encodes the dynamics, such as the kinetic barriers for unfolding and refolding, is not. Here we have looked at two subtiliase homologs from Bacillus subtilis , Intracellular Subtilisin Protease 1 (ISP1) and Subtilisin E (SbtE), that are expected to have very different dynamics. ISP1, an intracellular protein, has a small pro‐domain thought to act simply as a zymogen, whereas the extracellular SbtE has a large pro‐domain required for folding. The stability and kinetics of the mature proteins have been previously characterized; here we compare their energy landscapes with and without the pro‐domain, examining global and local energetics of the mature proteases and the effect of each pro‐domain. We find that ISP1's pro‐domain has limited impact on the energy landscape of the mature protein. For SbtE, the protein is thermodynamically unstable and kinetically trapped without the pro‐domain. The pro‐domains' effects on the flexibility of the core of the proteins are different: in the absence of its pro‐domain, ISP1's core becomes more flexible, while SbtE's core becomes more rigid. ISP1 contains a conserved insertion, which points to a potential source for these differences. These homologs show how changes in the primary sequence can dramatically alter a protein's energy landscape and highlight the need for large‐scale, high‐throughput studies on the relationship between primary sequence and conformational dynamics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.70264

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1021/bi00190a002 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/356263a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/bi00065a035 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/bi00032a026 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/cr010190b · DOI
  7. 10.1093/protein/8.3.211 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s41594-022-00735-5 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02423.x · DOI
  10. 10.1074/jbc.275.22.16871 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1014229108 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-382219-2.00693-1 · DOI
  13. Heinrikson RL, 1977, Methods in enzymology, 175
  14. 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60129-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)37656-7 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/415343a · DOI
  17. 10.1007/978-3-642-48380-6 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0006-291X(91)90938-4 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91042-N · DOI
  20. 10.1051/jcp/1968650044 · DOI
  21. 10.1074/jbc.270.42.25127 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0003-9861(74)80018-4 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00720 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.085 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/jb.01455-13 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.02.004 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/27470 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.052 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0091-679X(07)84011-8 · DOI
  30. 10.1128/jb.133.3.1401-1411.1978 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/bi048397x · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01014-9 · DOI
  33. Turnbull PCB, 1996, Medical microbiology
  34. 10.1016/j.str.2010.03.008 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5167 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0968-0004(88)90121-1 · DOI
  37. 10.1074/jbc.M107573200 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/protein/9.1.77 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.077 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hood, M. R., & Marqusee, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • QB3 (US)
Corresponding author
Marqusee, Susan
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-08-18
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
e70264-e70264
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4413285797
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (GM 149319)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein energy landscape, subtilisin, propeptide, protein folding kinetics, kinetic trapping, thermodynamic stability, sequence-structure-function relationships, Bacillus subtilis, zymogen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review