The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the sequence and structural determinants of the energy landscape from thermodynamically stable and kinetically trapped subtilisins: ISP1 and SbtE
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
A protein's energy landscape, all accessible conformations, their populations, and dynamics of interconversion, is encoded in its primary sequence. While how this sequence encodes a protein's native state is well understood, how it encodes the dynamics, such as the kinetic barriers for unfolding and refolding, is not. Here we have looked at two subtiliase homologs from Bacillus subtilis , Intracellular Subtilisin Protease 1 (ISP1) and Subtilisin E (SbtE), that are expected to have very different dynamics. ISP1, an intracellular protein, has a small pro‐domain thought to act simply as a zymogen, whereas the extracellular SbtE has a large pro‐domain required for folding. The stability and kinetics of the mature proteins have been previously characterized; here we compare their energy landscapes with and without the pro‐domain, examining global and local energetics of the mature proteases and the effect of each pro‐domain. We find that ISP1's pro‐domain has limited impact on the energy landscape of the mature protein. For SbtE, the protein is thermodynamically unstable and kinetically trapped without the pro‐domain. The pro‐domains' effects on the flexibility of the core of the proteins are different: in the absence of its pro‐domain, ISP1's core becomes more flexible, while SbtE's core becomes more rigid. ISP1 contains a conserved insertion, which points to a potential source for these differences. These homologs show how changes in the primary sequence can dramatically alter a protein's energy landscape and highlight the need for large‐scale, high‐throughput studies on the relationship between primary sequence and conformational dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861
Zhu, X., Ohta, Y., Jordan, F., & Inouye, M. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/339483a0 · Cited by 344
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/bi00190a002 · DOI
- 10.1038/356263a0 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00065a035 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00032a026 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr010190b · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/8.3.211 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41594-022-00735-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02423.x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.275.22.16871 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1014229108 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-382219-2.00693-1 · DOI
- Heinrikson RL, 1977, Methods in enzymology, 175
- 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60129-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)37656-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/415343a · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-48380-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-291X(91)90938-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91042-N · DOI
- 10.1051/jcp/1968650044 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.270.42.25127 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0003-9861(74)80018-4 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00720 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.085 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.01455-13 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/27470 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.052 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0091-679X(07)84011-8 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.133.3.1401-1411.1978 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi048397x · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01014-9 · DOI
- Turnbull PCB, 1996, Medical microbiology
- 10.1016/j.str.2010.03.008 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5167 · DOI
- 10.1016/0968-0004(88)90121-1 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M107573200 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/9.1.77 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.077 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Hood, M. R., & Marqusee, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- QB3 (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marqusee, Susan
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-08-18
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e70264-e70264
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC11419036
- OpenAlex
- W4413285797
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (GM 149319)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein energy landscape, subtilisin, propeptide, protein folding kinetics, kinetic trapping, thermodynamic stability, sequence-structure-function relationships, Bacillus subtilis, zymogen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review