Cited by 6Protein Structure and Dynamicsvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

ProteinMCP : An agentic AI framework for autonomous protein engineering

Open access
Xu, Xiaopeng, Feng, Chenjie, Zha, Chao, He, Wenjia, He, Maolin, Xiao, Bin, Gao, Xin·2026·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Computational protein design is often constrained by slow, complex, inaccessible, and highly sophisticated and expert‐dependent workflows that hinder its transferrability and generalization power for broader applications. We present ProteinMCP, an agentic AI framework designed to accelerate and democratize protein engineering. ProteinMCP automates end‐to‐end scientific tasks, delivering dramatic gains in efficiency; for instance, a comprehensive protein fitness modeling workflow was completed in just 11 min. This performance is achieved by an AI agent that intelligently orchestrates a unified ecosystem of 38 specialized tools, made accessible through a model‐context‐protocol (MCP). A cornerstone of the framework is an automated pipeline that converts existing software into MCP‐compliant servers, ensuring the platform is both powerful and perpetually extensible. We further demonstrate its capabilities through the successful autonomous design and selection of high‐affinity de novo binders and therapeutic nanobodies. By removing technical barriers, ProteinMCP has the potential to shorten the design‐build‐test cycle and make advanced computational protein design accessible to the broader scientific community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.70547

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Xu, X., Feng, C., Zha, C., He, W., He, M., Xiao, B., & Gao, X.
Affiliations
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
  • Ningxia Medical University (CN)
  • Bestzyme Biotech Inc. Piscataway New Jersey USA
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Xiaopeng
  • Gao, Xin
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-03-25
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
e70547-e70547
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W7140322094
Cited by
6
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (REI/1/5234‐01‐01, REI/1/5289‐01‐01, REI/1/5404‐01‐01, REI/1/5414‐01‐01, REI/1/5992‐01‐01, URF/1/4663‐01‐01)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province (2024AAC03247, 2024BEH04022)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
agentic AI, computational protein design, AI agents, Model Context Protocol, design-build-test cycle
MeSH terms
Intelligent Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Proteins, Software, Protein Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review