The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental demonstration of quantum logic operations using linear optical elements
Abstract
Probabilistic quantum logic operations can be implemented using linear optical elements, additional photons (ancilla), and post‐selection based on the results of measurements made on the ancilla photons. Here we describe the experimental demonstration of several quantum logic devices of that kind, including a quantum parity check and a destructive controlled‐NOT (CNOT) gate. An experimental demonstration of feed‐forward control for use in quantum logic operations is also reported. The implementation of a conventional CNOT gate using polarizing beam splitters is described, along with a new “high‐fidelity” approach in which the logic gates always produce an output.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A destructive CNOT gate was demonstrated by Franson et al. (2003) and O'Brien et al. (2003).
“A destructive CNOT gate was demonstrated by Franson et al. (2003) and O'Brien et al. (2003).”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Franson et al. (2003)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
- Pittman T.B., 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett.
- Pittman T.B., 2002, Phys. Rev. A
- Franson J.D., 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett.
- 10.1038/35074041 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.030301 · DOI · Paper page
- S.Giacomini F.Sciarrino E.Lombardi andF.De Martini quant‐ph/0204158. · arXiv
- 10.1038/46503 · DOI · Paper page
- P.Kok C.P.Williams andJ.P.Dowling quant‐ph/0203134. · arXiv
- Jacobs B.C., 2002, Phys. Rev. A
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Metadata
- Authors
- Franson, J. D., Jacobs, B. C., & Pittman, T. B.
- Venue
- Fortschritte der Physik
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-24
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 369-378
- ISSN
- 0015-8208
- 1521-3978
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
