Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How the no-cloning theorem got its name

Peres, A.·2003·Fortschritte der Physik

Abstract

I was the referee who approved the publication of Nick Herbert's FLASH paper, knowing perfectly well that it was wrong. I explain why my decision was the correct one, and I briefly review the progress to which it led.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prop.200310062

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bell-ports have been discussed theoretically for many years in connection to multipartite and high-dimensional quantum information.

    “Bell-ports have been discussed theoretically since many years in connection to multipartite and high-dimensional quantum information [137,139,140].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [140]

  • A Bell-tritter redistributes the three incoming photons to the three output ports in an unbiased way.

    “which redistributes the three incoming photons to the three output ports in an unbiased way.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [140]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1016/0375-9601(82)90084-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. A.Peres in Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory ed. byA.R.Marlow(Academic Press New York 1978) p. 357. · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF00729622 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/BF02721378 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb12437.x · DOI
  6. 10.1145/1008908.1008920 · DOI · Paper page
  7. C.H.Bennett G.Brassard S.Breidbart andS.Wiesner in Advances in Cryptology (Proceedings of Crypto‐82 Plenum New York 1983) p. 267. · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2368 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3320 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4999 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.040301 · DOI
  12. 10.1023/A:1007581027660 · DOI
  13. M.KoashiandN.Imoto quant‐ph/0101144. · arXiv
  14. R.Jozsa quant‐ph/0204153. · arXiv
  15. 10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00170-4 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00562-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062302 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.044307 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/18.761271 · DOI
  20. R.Y.ChiaoandA.M.Steinberg in Progress in Optics Vol. XXXVII edited byE.Wolf(Elsevier Amsterdam 1997);
  21. 10.1238/Physica.Topical.076a00061 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00381-8 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.022117 · DOI
  24. 10.1023/A:1018726717481 · DOI
  25. B.d'Espagnat Veiled Reality (Addison‐Wesley Reading 1995) p. 105.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peres, A.
Venue
Fortschritte der Physik
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-24
Volume
51
Issue
4-5
Pages
458-461
ISSN
  • 0015-8208
  • 1521-3978
Cited by
20
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review