The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem
Open accessAbstract
We provide the perturbative and non‐perturbative arguments showing that theories with large number of species of the quantum fields, imply an inevitable hierarchy between the masses of the species and the Planck scale, shedding a different light on the hierarchy problem. In particular, using the black hole physics, we prove that any consistent theory that includes N Z 2‐conserved species of the quantum fields of mass Λ, must have a value of the Planck mass, which in large N limit is given by M P2 \gsim N Λ 2. An useful byproduct of this proof is that any exactly conserved quantum charge, not associated with a long‐range classical field, must be defined maximum modulo N, with N \gsim (M P/m)2, where m is the mass of the unit charge. For example, a continuous global U(1) ‘baryon number’ symmetry, must be explicitly broken by gravity, at least down to a Z N subgroup, with N \lsim (M P/m b)2, where m b is the baryon mass. The same constraint applies to any discrete gauge symmetry, as well as to other quantum‐mechanically‐detectable black hole charges that are associated with the massive quantum hair of the black hole. We show that the gravitationally‐coupled N‐species sector that solves the gauge hirearchy problem, should be probed by LHC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Self-citation4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space
Dvali, G., Gabadadze, G., & Porrati, M. (2000) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00669-9 · Cited by 3,513
Self-citation
Cited by
The Swampland: Introduction and Review
Palti, E. (2019) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 · Cited by 908
Entanglement Entropy of Black Holes
Solodukhin, S. N. (2011) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-8 · Cited by 453
Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications
van Beest, M., Calderón-Infante, J., Mirfendereski, D., & Valenzuela, I. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 · Cited by 336
Symmetry of Cosmological Observables, a Mirror World Dark Sector, and the Hubble Constant
Cyr-Racine, F.-Y., Ge, F., & Knox, L. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.201301 · Cited by 75
Emparan, R., Pedraza, J. F., Svesko, A., Tomašević, M., & Visser, M. R. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2022)073 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Dvali, G.
- Venue
- Fortschritte der Physik
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 528-536
- ISSN
- 0015-8208 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3978
- OpenAlex
- W2065086422
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prop.201000009
- The paper
- Dvali, G. (2010). Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem. Fortschritte der Physik. https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.201000009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.