Cited by 90Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Widely used prostate carcinoma cell lines share common origins

van Bokhoven, Adrie, Varella‐Garcia, Marileila, Korch, Christopher, Hessels, Daphne, Miller, Gary J.·2001·The Prostate

Abstract

Background Cross-contamination is a persistent problem in the establishment and maintenance of mammalian cell lines. The observation that the cell lines PC-3, ALVA-31, and PPC-1 all have a homozygous deletion of the alpha-catenin gene prompted us to investigate the uniqueness of these and several other widely used prostate carcinoma cell lines. Methods The genetic backgrounds of the putative human prostate cell lines (ALVA-31, ALVA-41, BPH-1, DU 145, JCA-1, LAPC-4, LNCaP, NCI-H660, ND-1, PC-3, PC-3MM2, PC-346C, PPC-1, and TSU-Pr1) were analyzed by cytogenetics, mutation analysis, and DNA profiling. Results Similarities between several groups of cell lines were found. ALVA-31, ALVA-41, PC-3, PC-3MM2, and PPC-1 all have a deletion of a C in codon 138 of the p53 gene and show almost identical DNA profiles. The ND-1 cell line has two p53 mutations that are identical to the mutations found in DU 145. These two cell lines also share a high number of structural chromosomal abnormalities and nearly identical DNA profiles. The cell lines TSU-Pr1 and JCA-1 share an identical p53 mutation in exon 5 and identical DNA profiles. Conclusions Several widely used prostate carcinoma cell lines apparently have identities in common. The knowledge that some of these cell lines are derivatives of one another prompts re-evaluation of previously obtained results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pros.1045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 69 · Cited by 90

Authors
van Bokhoven, A., Varella‐Garcia, M., Korch, C., Hessels, D., & Miller, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Health (US)
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Gary J.
Venue
The Prostate
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-03-21
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
36-51
ISSN
  • 0270-4137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0045
OpenAlex
W2031602769
Cited by
90
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Prostate (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca053520-06)
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA084269, CA-53520, CA-84269, CA-46934, P30CA046934)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
cell line cross-contamination, TP53 mutation, DNA fingerprinting, chromosomal abnormalities, PC-3 cells, cell line origin, genetic background
MeSH terms
Cytogenetics, DNA Mutational Analysis, HeLa Cells, Humans, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Prostatic Neoplasms, Genes, ras, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, DNA Primers, Cell Lineage, Genes, Neoplasm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review