The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins
Abstract
Knowing the coordination number and relative solvent accessibility of all the residues in a protein is crucial for deriving constraints useful in modeling protein folding and protein structure and in scoring remote homology searches. We develop ensembles of bidirectional recurrent neural network architectures to improve the state of the art in both contact and accessibility prediction, leveraging a large corpus of curated data together with evolutionary information. The ensembles are used to discriminate between two different states of residue contacts or relative solvent accessibility, higher or lower than a threshold determined by the average value of the residue distribution or the accessibility cutoff. For coordination numbers, the ensemble achieves performances ranging within 70.6–73.9% depending on the radius adopted to discriminate contacts (6Å–12Å). These performances represent gains of 16–20% over the baseline statistical predictor, always assigning an amino acid to the largest class, and are 4–7% better than any previous method. A combination of different radius predictors further improves performance. For accessibility thresholds in the relevant 15–30% range, the ensemble consistently achieves a performance above 77%, which is 10–16% above the baseline prediction and better than other existing predictors, by up to several percentage points. For both problems, we quantify the improvement due to evolutionary information in the form of PSI‐BLAST‐generated profiles over BLAST profiles. The prediction programs are implemented in the form of two web servers, CONpro and ACCpro, available at http://promoter.ics.uci.edu/BRNN‐PRED/. Proteins 2002;47:142–153. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences.
Lupas, A., Van Dyke, M., & Stock, J. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.252.5009.1162 · Cited by 3,953
Cited by
Ashkenazy, H., Abadi, S., Martz, E., Chay, O., Mayrose, I., Pupko, T., & Ben-Tal, N. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw408 · Cited by 3,163
Prediction of protein stability changes for single‐site mutations using support vector machines
Cheng, J., Randall, A., & Baldi, P. (2006) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20810 · Cited by 1,160
Self-citationSCRATCH: a protein structure and structural feature prediction server
Cheng, J., Randall, A. Z., Sweredoski, M. J., & Baldi, P. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki396 · Cited by 1,044
Self-citationPollastri, G., Przybylski, D., Rost, B., & Baldi, P. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10082 · Cited by 743
Self-citationMaximum Allowed Solvent Accessibilites of Residues in Proteins
Tien, M. Z., Meyer, A. G., Sydykova, D. K., Spielman, S. J., & Wilke, C. O. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080635 · Cited by 511
The functional landscape of the human phosphoproteome
Ochoa, D., Jarnuczak, A. F., Viéitez, C., Gehre, M., Soucheray, M., Mateus, A., Kleefeldt, A. A., Hill, A., Garcia-Alonso, L., Stein, F., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0344-3 · Cited by 491
Heffernan, R., Yang, Y., Paliwal, K., & Zhou, Y. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx218 · Cited by 357
Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins
Adamczak, R., Porollo, A., & Meller, J. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20441 · Cited by 307
Inter-residue interactions in protein folding and stability
Gromiha, M. M., & Selvaraj, S. (2004) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2003.09.003 · Cited by 306
ASAView: Database and tool for solvent accessibility representation in proteins
Ahmad, S., Gromiha, M., Fawareh, H., & Sarai, A. (2004) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-51 · Cited by 283
Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks–based regression
Adamczak, R., Porollo, A., & Meller, J. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20176 · Cited by 273
Deep learning in biomedical data science
Baldi, P. (2018) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013343 · Cited by 119
rawMSA: End-to-end Deep Learning using raw Multiple Sequence Alignments
Mirabello, C., & Wallner, B. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220182 · Cited by 105
Jain, T., Boland, T., Lilov, A., Burnina, I., Brown, M., Xu, Y., & Vásquez, M. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx519 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollastri, G., Baldi, P., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 142-153
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2106116715
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.