Cited by 21Enzyme Structure and FunctionAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

X‐ray structure of an M. jannaschii DNA‐binding protein: Implications for antibiotic resistance in S. aureus

Open access
Ray, Soumya S., Bonanno, Jeffrey B., Chen, Hua, de Lencastre, Herminia, Wu, Shangwei, Tomasz, Alexander, Burley, Stephen K.·2003·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Bacterial resistance to commonly used antibiotics, such as the β-lactams and vancomycin, has become a major public health concern.1, 2 Research in the area of methicillin resistance revealed a number of auxiliary genes that augment the function of PBP2a, the gene product primarily responsible for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.3 Although some of these auxiliary methicillin resistance proteins contribute to well-characterized biosynthetic pathways (e.g., cell wall metabolism), functions for several of these gene products remain elusive.4 This article describes the X-ray structure of a Methanococcus jannaschii protein that is related to one such auxiliary gene product, RUSA223 [Genbank Code: CAB60749]. The S. aureus auxiliary gene product RUSA223 and its ortholog from M. jannaschii [Genbank Code: NP_248571, PSI-BLAST E-value = 10−25, sequence identity = 23%] were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) with N-terminal His-tags. Following Ni-affinity chromatography, each protein was purified to homogeneity using an S Sepharose ion exchange column. Initial crystallization trials with the S. aureus protein yielded neither crystals nor promising leads. Dynamic light scattering studies demonstrated that RUSA223 was severely aggregated at submilligram concentrations in aqueous solution. Mj223 yielded crystals in a number of related conditions. Diffraction-quality crystals grown via hanging drop vapor diffusion against a solution containing 0.1 M Tris HCl 8.0, 30% PEG8000, and 10% dioxane belong to the hexagonal space group P65 (unit cell: a = 57.0 Å, c = 208.4 Å; two protomers per asymmetric unit). Selenomethionine-labeled Mj223, prepared as described above, yielded crystals under very similar conditions. Following cryoprotection with added glycerol (25% v/v), X-ray data were collected at two wavelengths in the vicinity of the Se K-edge from a single crystal maintained at 100 K. Diffraction data were processed with DENZO/SCALEPACK5 (Table I), and the heavy atom substructure (four selenium sites/asymmetric unit) was elucidated with SnB.6 Se atomic positions were refined, and experimental phases were calculated with MLPHARE7 at 2.8 Å resolution (figure of merit = 0.64). Density modification yielded an interpretable electron density, which allowed tracing of the entire polypeptide chain (Met1-Asp151). This initial model was subjected to refinement with CNS8 against diffraction data obtained from an S-Met crystal, giving a final R-factor of 26.2% with R-free = 29.3% (Table I). The N-terminal portion of Mj223 resembles a helix-turn-helix (HTH) winged-helix DNA binding motif,9 which suggests that it functions as a transcription factor. The C-terminal region of the protein is composed of two leucine-rich α-helices, which form a dimer with a neighboring protomer that is related by noncrystallographic two-fold symmetry [Fig. 1(a)]. Dynamic light scattering studies documented that the protein is indeed a dimer in solution (data not shown). The order of secondary structural elements in Mj223 is H1−H2−S1−H3-H4−S2−S3−H5−H6 (where H and S denote α-helices and β-strands, respectively). α-helices H5-H6 and H5′-H6′ (′ denotes the second protomer) dimerize to form an antiparallel four-helix bundle (buried surface area = 4551 Å2), which represents a novel dimerization motif not previously observed in dimeric transcription factors. Mj223 homodimer structure: (a) ribbon representation of the Mj223 dimer with labeled secondary structure elements, colored blue (α-helices) and orange (β-strands) in one protomer with the second protomer colored red; (b) ribbon representation of Mj223 docked with linear B-form DNA; (c) GRASP15 representation of the chemical properties of the solvent-accessible surface of Mj223, calculated using a water probe radius of 1.4 Å. Solvent-accessible surface has been color-coded for the calculated electrostatic potential (red and blue, respectively, represent electrostatic potentials <−8 and >+8 KBT, where KB is the Boltzmann constant and T is temperature). Calculations were performed with an ionic strength of zero and dielectric constants of 80 and 2 for solvent and protein, respectively. The surface of the winged-helix domain is both basic and hydrophobic. The winged-helix domain is one of the most common DNA-binding motifs responsible for controlling transcription initiation in both bacteria and eukaryotes.9 We believe that the Mj223 dimer binds to a symmetric pair of half-sites by presenting α-helices H4 and H4′ to the major groove of duplex B-form DNA [Fig. 1(b)]. The calculated electrostatic potential for the putative DNA-binding surface is both basic and hydrophobic, and the separation of the two recognition α-helices is compatible with major groove binding [Fig. 1(c)]. The linear extent of the predicted DNA footprint is about 40 Å, which corresponds to two adjacent 7 base pair (bp) recognition sites related by two-fold symmetry [Fig. 1(b)]. Mj223 is structurally similar to the eubacterial

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.10272

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, S. S., Bonanno, J. B., Chen, H., de Lencastre, H., Wu, S., Tomasz, A., & Burley, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Burley, Stephen K.
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11-26
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
170-173
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W2075190638
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50-GM62529, P50GM062529)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI045738, R01-AI45738)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
Methanococcus jannaschii, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin resistance, PBP2a, DNA-binding proteins, protein crystal structure, selenomethionine labeling, protein aggregation, antibiotic resistance, vancomycin resistance, beta-lactam resistance, protein crystallization
MeSH terms
DNA-Binding Proteins, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin Resistance, Methanococcus, Crystallography, X-Ray

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review