The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RDOCK: Refinement of rigid‐body protein docking predictions
Abstract
We present a simple and effective algorithm RDOCK for refining unbound predictions generated by a rigid‐body docking algorithm ZDOCK, which has been developed earlier by our group. The main component of RDOCK is a three‐stage energy minimization scheme, followed by the evaluation of electrostatic and desolvation energies. Ionic side chains are kept neutral in the first two stages of minimization, and reverted to their full charge states in the last stage of brief minimization. Without side chain conformational search or filtering/clustering of resulting structures, RDOCK represents the simplest approach toward refining unbound docking predictions. Despite its simplicity, RDOCK makes substantial improvement upon the top predictions by ZDOCK with all three scoring functions and the improvement is observed across all three categories of test cases in a large benchmark of 49 non‐redundant unbound test cases. RDOCK makes the most powerful combination with ZDOCK2.1, which uses pairwise shape complementarity as the scoring function. Collectively, they rank a near‐native structure as the number‐one prediction for 18 test cases (37% of the benchmark), and within the top 4 predictions for 24 test cases (49% of the benchmark). To various degrees, funnel‐like energy landscapes are observed for these 24 test cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of binding funnels starting from global searches for a broad range of test cases. These results are particularly exciting, given that we have not used any biological information that is specific to individual test cases and the whole process is entirely automated. Among three categories of test cases, the best results are seen for enzyme/inhibitor, with a near‐native structure ranked as the number‐one prediction for 48% test cases, and within the top 10 predictions for 78% test cases. RDOCK is freely available to academic users at http://zlab.bu.edu/∼rong/dock. Proteins 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Putnam, C. D., Hammel, M., Hura, G. L., & Tainer, J. A. (2007) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583507004635 · Cited by 1,184
PIPER: An FFT‐based protein docking program with pairwise potentials
Kozakov, D., Brenke, R., Comeau, S. R., & Vajda, S. (2006) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21117 · Cited by 865
Chae, J. J., Wood, G., Masters, S. L., Richard, K., Park, G., Smith, B. J., & Kastner, D. L. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0602081103 · Cited by 554
AI in drug discovery and its clinical relevance
Qureshi, R., Irfan, M., Gondal, T. M., Khan, S., Wu, J., Hadi, M. U., Heymach, J., Le, X., Yan, H., & Alam, T. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17575 · Cited by 319
Flexible protein–protein docking
Bonvin, A. M. (2006) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2006.02.002 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Chen, R., & Weng, Z.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 693-707
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2138227733
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RDOCK: Refinement of rigid‐body protein docking predictions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.10460
- The paper
- Li, L., Chen, R., & Weng, Z. (2003). RDOCK: Refinement of rigid‐body protein docking predictions. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.10460
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.