The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the Robetta server
Abstract
Robetta is a fully automated protein structure prediction server that uses the Rosetta fragment-insertion method. It combines template-based and de novo structure prediction methods in an attempt to produce high quality models that cover every residue of a submitted sequence. The first step in the procedure is the automatic detection of the locations of domains and selection of the appropriate modeling protocol for each domain. For domains matched to a homolog with an experimentally characterized structure by PSI-BLAST or Pcons2, Robetta uses a new alignment method, called K*Sync, to align the query sequence onto the parent structure. It then models the variable regions by allowing them to explore conformational space with fragments in fashion similar to the de novo protocol, but in the context of the template. When no structural homolog is available, domains are modeled with the Rosetta de novo protocol, which allows the full length of the domain to explore conformational space via fragment-insertion, producing a large decoy ensemble from which the final models are selected. The Robetta server produced quite reasonable predictions for targets in the recent CASP-5 and CAFASP-3 experiments, some of which were at the level of the best human predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Cited by
Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server
Kim, D. E., Chivian, D., & Baker, D. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh468 · Cited by 2,111
Self-citationLeaver-Fay (2011) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · Cited by 1,904
Als3 Is a Candida albicans Invasin That Binds to Cadherins and Induces Endocytosis by Host Cells
Phan, Q. T., Myers, C. L., Fu, Y., Sheppard, D. C., Yeaman, M. R., Welch, W. H., Ibrahim, A. S., Edwards, J. E., & Filler, S. G. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050064 · Cited by 641
Mass-spectrometric identification and relative quantification of N-linked cell surface glycoproteins
Wollscheid, B., Bausch-Fluck, D., Henderson, C., O'Brien, R., Bibel, M., Schiess, R., Aebersold, R., & Watts, J. D. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1532 · Cited by 547
Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta
Rohl, C. A., Strauss, C. E. M., Chivian, D., & Baker, D. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10629 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chivian, D., Kim, D. E., Malmstr�m, L., Bradley, P., Robertson, T., Murphy, P., Strauss, C. E. M., Bonneau, R., Rohl, C. A., & Baker, D.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- S6
- Pages
- 524-533
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2145149019
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.