A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding
Abstract
Extracting knowledge-based statistical potential from known structures of proteins is proved to be a simple, effective method to obtain an approximate free-energy function. However, the different compositions of amino acid residues at the core, the surface, and the binding interface of proteins prohibited the establishment of a unified statistical potential for folding and binding despite the fact that the physical basis of the interaction (water-mediated interaction between amino acids) is the same. Recently, a physical state of ideal gas, rather than a statistically averaged state, has been used as the reference state for extracting the net interaction energy between amino acid residues of monomeric proteins. Here, we find that this monomer-based potential is more accurate than an existing all-atom knowledge-based potential trained with interfacial structures of dimers in distinguishing native complex structures from docking decoys (100% success rate vs. 52% in 21 dimer/trimer decoy sets). It is also more accurate than a recently developed semiphysical empirical free-energy functional enhanced by an orientation-dependent hydrogen-bonding potential in distinguishing native state from Rosetta docking decoys (94% success rate vs. 74% in 31 antibody-antigen and other complexes based on Z score). In addition, the monomer potential achieved a 93% success rate in distinguishing true dimeric interfaces from artificial crystal interfaces. More importantly, without additional parameters, the potential provides an accurate prediction of binding free energy of protein-peptide and protein-protein complexes (a correlation coefficient of 0.87 and a root-mean-square deviation of 1.76 kcal/mol with 69 experimental data points). This work marks a significant step toward a unified knowledge-based potential that quantitatively captures the common physical principle underlying folding and binding. A Web server for academic users, established for the prediction of binding free energy and the energy evaluation of the protein-protein complexes, may be found at http://theory.med.buffalo.edu.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The six benchmark datasets have been widely used to test the predictive power of PPI prediction methods.
“These datasets have been widely used to test the predictive power of the PPI prediction methods [12, 13, 27–29, 29–35].”
From Deep geometric representations for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 193
- Authors
- Liu, S., Zhang, C., Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Yaoqi
- Venue
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-16
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-101
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2138913459
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM 966049, R01GM068530)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- potential of mean force, protein folding, protein-protein binding, binding free energy prediction, reference state, protein-protein complex, protein-peptide complex, decoy discrimination, protein dimer interface, immune complexes
- MeSH terms
- Antigen-Antibody Complex, Binding Sites, Hydrogen Bonding, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thermodynamics, Databases, Factual, Protein Folding, Dimerization, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review