The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins?
Abstract
Allostery involves coupling of conformational changes between two widely separated binding sites. The common view holds that allosteric proteins are symmetric oligomers, with each subunit existing in “at least” two conformational states with a different affinity for ligands. Recent observations such as the allosteric behavior of myoglobin, a classical example of a nonallosteric protein, call into question the existing allosteric dogma. Here we argue that all (nonfibrous) proteins are potentially allosteric. Allostery is a consequence of re‐distributions of protein conformational ensembles. In a nonallosteric protein, the binding site shape may not show a concerted second‐site change and enzyme kinetics may not reflect an allosteric transition. Nevertheless, appropriate ligands, point mutations, or external conditions may facilitate a population shift, leading a presumably nonallosteric protein to behave allosterically. In principle, practically any potential drug binding to the protein surface can alter the conformational redistribution. The question is its effectiveness in the redistribution of the ensemble, affecting the protein binding sites and its function. Here, we review experimental observations validating this view of protein allostery. Proteins 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery
Teague, S. J. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1129 · Cited by 755
Folding funnels and binding mechanisms
Ma, B., Kumar, S., Tsai, C.-J., & Nussinov, R. (1999) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/12.9.713 · Cited by 594
Self-citationTransition-state Ensemble in Enzyme Catalysis: Possibility, Reality, or Necessity?
MA, B., KUMAR, S., TSAI, C.-J., HU, Z., & NUSSINOV, R. (2000) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.1097 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Cited by
The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition
Boehr, D. D., Nussinov, R., & Wright, P. E. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.232 · Cited by 2,008
Self-citationThe ensemble nature of allostery
Motlagh, H. N., Wrabl, J. O., Li, J., & Hilser, V. J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13001 · Cited by 1,247
Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040409x · Cited by 697
Self-citationAllosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via a common route
Goodey, N. M., & Benkovic, S. J. (2008) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.98 · Cited by 667
An introduction to NMR-based approaches for measuring protein dynamics
Kleckner, I. R., & Foster, M. P. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.10.012 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Gunasekaran, K., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-22
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 433-443
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2049682677
- Cited by
- 879
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.