The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energy landscape of a small peptide revealed by dihedral angle principal component analysis
Abstract
A 100 ns molecular dynamics simulation of penta‐alanine in explicit water is performed to study the reversible folding and unfolding of the peptide. Employing a standard principal component analysis (PCA) using Cartesian coordinates, the resulting free‐energy landscape is found to have a single minimum, thus suggesting a simple, relatively smooth free‐energy landscape. Introducing a novel PCA based on a transformation of the peptide dihedral angles, it is found, however, that there are numerous free energy minima of comparable energy (≲ 1 kcal/mol), which correspond to well‐defined structures with characteristic hydrogen‐bonding patterns. That is, the true free‐energy landscape is actually quite rugged and its smooth appearance in the Cartesian PCA represents an artifact of the mixing of internal and overall motion. Well‐separated minima corresponding to specific conformational structures are also found in the unfolded part of the free energy landscape, revealing that the unfolded state of penta‐alanine is structured rather than random. Performing a connectivity analysis, it is shown that neighboring states are connected by low barriers of similar height and that each state typically makes transitions to three or four neighbor states. Several principal pathways for helix nucleation are identified and discussed in some detail. Proteins 2005. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
THEORY OF PROTEIN FOLDING: The Energy Landscape Perspective
Onuchic, J. N., Luthey-Schulten, Z., & Wolynes, P. G. (1997) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.545 · Cited by 2,210
Cited by
GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free
Van Der Spoel, D., Lindahl, E., Hess, B., Groenhof, G., Mark, A. E., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20291 · Cited by 19,182
Using collective variables to drive molecular dynamics simulations
Fiorin, G., Klein, M. L., & Hénin, J. (2013) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2013.813594 · Cited by 1,053
Schwantes, C. R., & Pande, V. S. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300878a · Cited by 597
Monomer adds to preformed structured oligomers of Aβ-peptides by a two-stage dock–lock mechanism
Nguyen, P. H., Li, M. S., Stock, G., Straub, J. E., & Thirumalai, D. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607440104 · Cited by 355
Self-citationDetermination of reaction coordinates via locally scaled diffusion map
Rohrdanz, M. A., Zheng, W., Maggioni, M., & Clementi, C. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3569857 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Mu, Y., Nguyen, P. H., & Stock, G.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-52
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2096125044
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.