The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of protein subcellular localization
Abstract
Because the protein's function is usually related to its subcellular localization, the ability to predict subcellular localization directly from protein sequences will be useful for inferring protein functions. Recent years have seen a surging interest in the development of novel computational tools to predict subcellular localization. At present, these approaches, based on a wide range of algorithms, have achieved varying degrees of success for specific organisms and for certain localization categories. A number of authors have noticed that sequence similarity is useful in predicting subcellular localization. For example, Nair and Rost (Protein Sci 2002;11:2836–2847) have carried out extensive analysis of the relation between sequence similarity and identity in subcellular localization, and have found a close relationship between them above a certain similarity threshold. However, many existing benchmark data sets used for the prediction accuracy assessment contain highly homologous sequences—some data sets comprising sequences up to 80–90% sequence identity. Using these benchmark test data will surely lead to overestimation of the performance of the methods considered. Here, we develop an approach based on a two‐level support vector machine (SVM) system: the first level comprises a number of SVM classifiers, each based on a specific type of feature vectors derived from sequences; the second level SVM classifier functions as the jury machine to generate the probability distribution of decisions for possible localizations. We compare our approach with a global sequence alignment approach and other existing approaches for two benchmark data sets—one comprising prokaryotic sequences and the other eukaryotic sequences. Furthermore, we carried out all‐against‐all sequence alignment for several data sets to investigate the relationship between sequence homology and subcellular localization. Our results, which are consistent with previous studies, indicate that the homology search approach performs well down to 30% sequence identity, although its performance deteriorates considerably for sequences sharing lower sequence identity. A data set of high homology levels will undoubtedly lead to biased assessment of the performances of the predictive approaches—especially those relying on homology search or sequence annotations. Our two‐level classification system based on SVM does not rely on homology search; therefore, its performance remains relatively unaffected by sequence homology. When compared with other approaches, our approach performed significantly better. Furthermore, we also develop a practical hybrid method, which combines the two‐level SVM classifier and the homology search method, as a general tool for the sequence annotation of subcellular localization. Proteins 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 3×
“The Matthew's correlation coefficient MCC is given by[39]”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Modeling the language of life – Deep Learning Protein Sequences
Heinzinger, M., Elnaggar, A., Wang, Y., Dallago, C., Nechaev, D., Matthes, F., & Rost, B. (2019) · doi:10.1101/614313 · Cited by 606
Modeling aspects of the language of life through transfer-learning protein sequences
Heinzinger, M., Elnaggar, A., Wang, Y., Dallago, C., Nechaev, D., Matthes, F., & Rost, B. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3220-8 · Cited by 606
“Subcellular localization prediction was trained and evaluated using the DeepLoc data set [47] for which performance was measured for several methods, namely: LocTree2 [72], MultiLoc2 [73], Sher-Loc2 [74], CELLO [75], iLoc-Euk [52], WoLF PSORT [76] and YLoc [77].”
MethodFocused specificity of intestinal TH17 cells towards commensal bacterial antigens
Yang, Y., Torchinsky, M. B., Gobert, M., Xiong, H., Xu, M., Linehan, J. L., Alonzo, F., Ng, C., Chen, A., Lin, X., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13279 · Cited by 520
BUSCA: an integrative web server to predict subcellular localization of proteins
Savojardo, C., Martelli, P. L., Fariselli, P., Profiti, G., & Casadio, R. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky320 · Cited by 452
Adaptive Evolution within Gut Microbiomes of Healthy People
Zhao, S., Lieberman, T. D., Poyet, M., Kauffman, K. M., Gibbons, S. M., Groussin, M., Xavier, R. J., & Alm, E. J. (2019) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.007 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, C., Chen, Y., Lu, C., & Hwang, J.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 643-651
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W1973253766
- Cited by
- 1,790
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of protein subcellular localization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.21018
- The paper
- Yu, C., Chen, Y., Lu, C., & Hwang, J. (2006). Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.