The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combining the polymerase incomplete primer extension method for cloning and mutagenesis with microscreening to accelerate structural genomics efforts
Abstract
Successful protein expression, purification, and crystallization for challenging targets typically requires evaluation of a multitude of expression constructs. Often many iterations of truncations and point mutations are required to identify a suitable derivative for recombinant expression. Making and characterizing these variants is a significant barrier to success. We have developed a rapid and efficient cloning process and combined it with a protein microscreening approach to characterize protein suitability for structural studies. The Polymerase Incomplete Primer Extension (PIPE) cloning method was used to rapidly clone 448 protein targets and then to generate 2143 truncations from 96 targets with minimal effort. Proteins were expressed, purified, and characterized via a microscreening protocol, which incorporates protein quantification, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and analytical size exclusion chromatography (AnSEC) to evaluate suitability of the protein products for X‐ray crystallography. The results suggest that selecting expression constructs for crystal trials based primarily on expression solubility is insufficient. Instead, AnSEC scoring as a measure of protein polydispersity was found to be predictive of ultimate structure determination success and essential for identifying appropriate boundaries for truncation series. Overall structure determination success was increased by at least 38% by applying this combined PIPE cloning and microscreening approach to recalcitrant targets. Proteins 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protein production and purification
Structural Genomics Consortium, Biologiques, A. E. F. D. M., Berkeley Structural Genomics Center, China Structural Genomics Consortium, Integrated Center for Structure and Function Innovation, Israel Structural Proteomics Center, Joint Center for Structural Genomics, Midwest Center for Structural Genomics, New York Structural GenomiX Research Center for Structural Genomics, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, et al. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.202 · Cited by 916
Jia, B., & Jeon, C. O. (2016) · Open Biology · doi:10.1098/rsob.160196 · Cited by 295
Strategies to Optimize Protein Expression in E. coli
Francis, D. M., & Page, R. (2010) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/0471140864.ps0524s61 · Cited by 272
Proteins evolve on the edge of supramolecular self-assembly
Garcia-Seisdedos, H., Empereur-Mot, C., Elad, N., & Levy, E. D. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23320 · Cited by 253
Howe, V., Sharpe, L. J., Prabhu, A. V., & Brown, A. J. (2017) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.03.009 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Klock, H. E., Koesema, E. J., Knuth, M. W., & Lesley, S. A.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-14
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 982-994
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2137587451
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining the polymerase incomplete primer extension method for cloning and mutagenesis with microscreening to accelerate structural genomics efforts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.21786
- The paper
- Klock, H. E., Koesema, E. J., Knuth, M. W., & Lesley, S. A. (2008). Combining the polymerase incomplete primer extension method for cloning and mutagenesis with microscreening to accelerate structural genomics efforts. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21786
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.