The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Very fast prediction and rationalization of p Ka values for protein–ligand complexes
Abstract
The PROPKA method for the prediction of the p Ka values of ionizable residues in proteins is extended to include the effect of non‐proteinaceous ligands on protein p Ka values as well as predict the change in p Ka values of ionizable groups on the ligand itself. This new version of PROPKA (PROPKA 2.0) is, as much as possible, developed by adapting the empirical rules underlying PROPKA 1.0 to ligand functional groups. Thus, the speed of PROPKA is retained, so that the p Ka values of all ionizable groups are computed in a matter of seconds for most proteins. This adaptation is validated by comparing PROPKA 2.0 predictions to experimental data for 26 protein–ligand complexes including trypsin, thrombin, three pepsins, HIV‐1 protease, chymotrypsin, xylanase, hydroxynitrile lyase, and dihydrofolate reductase. For trypsin and thrombin, large protonation state changes (|n| > 0.5) have been observed experimentally for 4 out of 14 ligand complexes. PROPKA 2.0 and Klebe's PEOE approach (Czodrowski P et al. J Mol Biol 2007;367:1347–1356) both identify three of the four large protonation state changes. The protonation state changes due to plasmepsin II, cathepsin D and endothiapepsin binding to pepstatin are predicted to within 0.4 proton units at pH 6.5 and 7.0, respectively. The PROPKA 2.0 results indicate that structural changes due to ligand binding contribute significantly to the proton uptake/release, as do residues far away from the binding site, primarily due to the change in the local environment of a particular residue and hence the change in the local hydrogen bonding network. Overall the results suggest that PROPKA 2.0 provides a good description of the protein–ligand interactions that have an important effect on the p Ka values of titratable groups, thereby permitting fast and accurate determination of the protonation states of key residues and ligand functional groups within the binding or active site of a protein. Proteins 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A practical guide to large-scale docking
Bender, B. J., Gahbauer, S., Luttens, A., Lyu, J., Webb, C. M., Stein, R. M., Fink, E. A., Balius, T. E., Carlsson, J., Irwin, J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00597-z · Cited by 546
“7), Maestro (Schrödinger) 48 , PropKa 49 or Chimera 50 can be used to protonate the target of interest.”
MethodXu, Y., Wang, S., Hu, Q., Gao, S., Ma, X., Zhang, W., Shen, Y., Chen, F., Lai, L., & Pei, J. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky380 · Cited by 389
AlphaFold2 models indicate that protein sequence determines both structure and dynamics
Guo, H.-B., Perminov, A., Bekele, S., Kedziora, G., Farajollahi, S., Varaljay, V., Hinkle, K., Molinero, V., Meister, K., Hung, C., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14382-9 · Cited by 248
The feasibility of coherent energy transfer in microtubules.
Craddock, T. J. A., Friesen, D., Mane, J., Hameroff, S., & Tuszynski, J. A. (2014) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0677 · Cited by 111
Biomolecular simulation and modelling: status, progress and prospects
van der Kamp, M. W., Shaw, K. E., Woods, C. J., & Mulholland, A. J. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0105.focus · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Bas, D. C., Rogers, D. M., & Jensen, J. H.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-22
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 765-783
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2076790509
- Cited by
- 1,092
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Very fast prediction and rationalization of p Ka values for protein–ligand complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.22102
- The paper
- Bas, D. C., Rogers, D. M., & Jensen, J. H. (2008). Very fast prediction and rationalization of p Ka values for protein–ligand complexes. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.