The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure prediction for CASP8 with all‐atom refinement using Rosetta
Open accessAbstract
We describe predictions made using the Rosetta structure prediction methodology for the Eighth Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. Aggressive sampling and all‐atom refinement were carried out for nearly all targets. A combination of alignment methodologies was used to generate starting models from a range of templates, and the models were then subjected to Rosetta all atom refinement. For the 64 domains with readily identified templates, the best submitted model was better than the best alignment to the best template in the Protein Data Bank for 24 cases, and improved over the best starting model for 43 cases. For 13 targets where only very distant sequence relationships to proteins of known structure were detected, models were generated using the Rosetta de novo structure prediction methodology followed by all‐atom refinement; in several cases the submitted models were better than those based on the available templates. Of the 12 refinement challenges, the best submitted model improved on the starting model in seven cases. These improvements over the starting template‐based models and refinement tests demonstrate the power of Rosetta structure refinement in improving model accuracy. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Cited by
The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (2015) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2015.053 · Cited by 9,652
Leaver-Fay (2011) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · Cited by 1,904
GalaxyRefine: protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking
Heo, L., Park, H., & Seok, C. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt458 · Cited by 1,363
Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation
Marks, D. S., Colwell, L. J., Sheridan, R., Hopf, T. A., Pagnani, A., Zecchina, R., & Sander, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 · Cited by 1,144
High-Resolution Comparative Modeling with RosettaCM
Song, Y., DiMaio, F., Wang, R. Y.-R., Kim, D., Miles, C., Brunette, T., Thompson, J., & Baker, D. (2013) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2013.08.005 · Cited by 1,115
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Raman, S., Vernon, R., Thompson, J., Tyka, M., Sadreyev, R., Pei, J., Kim, D., Kellogg, E., DiMaio, F., Lange, O., Kinch, L., Sheffler, W., Kim, B., Das, R., Grishin, N. V., & Baker, D.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- S9
- Pages
- 89-99
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2117020466
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure prediction for CASP8 with all‐atom refinement using Rosetta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.22540
- The paper
- Raman, S., Vernon, R., Thompson, J., Tyka, M., Sadreyev, R., Pei, J., Kim, D., Kellogg, E., DiMaio, F., Lange, O., Kinch, L., Sheffler, W., Kim, B., Das, R., Grishin, N. V., & Baker, D. (2009). Structure prediction for CASP8 with all‐atom refinement using Rosetta. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22540
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.