The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification, analysis, and prediction of protein ubiquitination sites
Open accessAbstract
Ubiquitination plays an important role in many cellular processes and is implicated in many diseases. Experimental identification of ubiquitination sites is challenging due to rapid turnover of ubiquitinated proteins and the large size of the ubiquitin modifier. We identified 141 new ubiquitination sites using a combination of liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, and mutant yeast strains. Investigation of the sequence biases and structural preferences around known ubiquitination sites indicated that their properties were similar to those of intrinsically disordered protein regions. Using a combined set of new and previously known ubiquitination sites, we developed a random forest predictor of ubiquitination sites, UbPred. The class‐balanced accuracy of UbPred reached 72%, with the area under the ROC curve at 80%. The application of UbPred showed that high confidence Rsp5 ubiquitin ligase substrates and proteins with very short half‐lives were significantly enriched in the number of predicted ubiquitination sites. Proteome‐wide prediction of ubiquitination sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae indicated that highly ubiquitinated substrates were prevalent among transcription/enzyme regulators and proteins involved in cell cycle control. In the human proteome, cytoskeletal, cell cycle, regulatory, and cancer‐associated proteins display higher extent of ubiquitination than proteins from other functional categories. We show that gain and loss of predicted ubiquitination sites may likely represent a molecular mechanism behind a number of disease‐associatedmutations. UbPred is available at http://www.ubpred.org. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Function
Dunker, A. K., Brown, C. J., Lawson, J. D., Iakoucheva, L. M., & Obradović, Z. (2002) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi012159+ · Cited by 1,731
Self-citationStructure of the Cul1–Rbx1–Skp1–F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex
Zheng, N., Schulman, B. A., Song, L., Miller, J. J., Jeffrey, P. D., Wang, P., Chu, C., Koepp, D. M., Elledge, S. J., Pagano, M., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416703a · Cited by 1,507
Intrinsic Disorder in Cell-signaling and Cancer-associated Proteins
Iakoucheva, L. M., Brown, C. J., Lawson, J. D., Obradović, Z., & Dunker, A. K. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00969-5 · Cited by 1,214
Self-citationAdjusting the Outputs of a Classifier to New a Priori Probabilities: A Simple Procedure
Saerens, M., Latinne, P., & Decaestecker, C. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602753284446 · Cited by 361
Cited by
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions
Oldfield, C. J., & Dunker, A. K. (2014) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-164947 · Cited by 1,057
Post-translational modifications in proteins: resources, tools and prediction methods
Ramazi, S., & Zahiri, J. (2021) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baab012 · Cited by 772
Intrinsically disordered proteins: regulation and disease
Babu, M. M., van der Lee, R., de Groot, N. S., & Gsponer, J. (2011) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.011 · Cited by 601
Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants
Thusberg, J., Olatubosun, A., & Vihinen, M. (2011) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.21445 · Cited by 537
Physicochemical Properties of Cells and Their Effects on Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs)
Theillet, F.-X., Binolfi, A., Frembgen-Kesner, T., Hingorani, K., Sarkar, M., Kyne, C., Li, C., Crowley, P. B., Gierasch, L., Pielak, G. J., et al. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400695p · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Radivojac, P., Vacic, V., Haynes, C., Cocklin, R. R., Mohan, A., Heyen, J. W., Goebl, M. G., & Iakoucheva, L. M.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-31
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 365-380
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2145786566
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.