The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side‐chain accuracy in homology modeling: Four approaches that performed well in CASP8
Open accessAbstract
A correct alignment is an essential requirement in homology modeling. Yet in order to bridge the structural gap between template and target, which may not only involve loop rearrangements, but also shifts of secondary structure elements and repacking of core residues, high‐resolution refinement methods with full atomic details are needed. Here, we describe four approaches that address this “last mile of the protein folding problem” and have performed well during CASP8, yielding physically realistic models: YASARA, which runs molecular dynamics simulations of models in explicit solvent, using a new partly knowledge‐based all atom force field derived from Amber, whose parameters have been optimized to minimize the damage done to protein crystal structures. The LEE‐SERVER, which makes extensive use of conformational space annealing to create alignments, to help Modeller build physically realistic models while satisfying input restraints from templates and CHARMM stereochemistry, and to remodel the side‐chains. ROSETTA, whose high resolution refinement protocol combines a physically realistic all atom force field with Monte Carlo minimization to allow the large conformational space to be sampled quickly. And finally UNDERTAKER, which creates a pool of candidate models from various templates and then optimizes them with an adaptive genetic algorithm, using a primarily empirical cost function that does not include bond angle, bond length, or other physics‐like terms. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2002) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.0217002 · Cited by 902
Cited by
Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: pathobiology and targeting strategies
Yamazaki, Y., Zhao, N., Caulfield, T. R., Liu, C.-C., & Bu, G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0228-7 · Cited by 1,425
Venselaar, H., te Beek, T. A., Kuipers, R. K., Hekkelman, M. L., & Vriend, G. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-548 · Cited by 1,162
Shapovalov, M. V., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.03.019 · Cited by 1,000
The PDB_REDO server for macromolecular structure model optimization
Joosten, R. P., Long, F., Murshudov, G. N., & Perrakis, A. (2014) · IUCrJ · doi:10.1107/s2052252514009324 · Cited by 834
AlphaFill: enriching AlphaFold models with ligands and cofactors
Hekkelman, M. L., de Vries, I., Joosten, R. P., & Perrakis, A. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01685-y · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Krieger, E., Joo, K., Lee, J., Lee, J., Raman, S., Thompson, J., Tyka, M., Baker, D., & Karplus, K.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- S9
- Pages
- 114-122
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2108627006
- Cited by
- 1,409
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.