The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Progress in the prediction of p Kavalues in proteins
Open accessAbstract
The p Ka‐cooperative aims to provide a forum for experimental and theoretical researchers interested in protein p Ka values and protein electrostatics in general. The first round of the p Ka‐cooperative, which challenged computational labs to carry out blind predictions against p Ka s experimentally determined in the laboratory of Bertrand Garcia‐Moreno, was completed and results discussed at the Telluride meeting (July 6–10, 2009). This article serves as an introduction to the reports submitted by the blind prediction participants that will be published in a special issue of PROTEINS: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics. Here, we briefly outline existing approaches for p Ka calculations, emphasizing methods that were used by the participants in calculating the blind p Ka values in the first round of the cooperative. We then point out some of the difficulties encountered by the participating groups in making their blind predictions, and finally try to provide some insights for future developments aimed at improving the accuracy of p Ka calculations. Proteins 2011; © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, L., Li, C., Zhang, Z., & Alexov, E. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400065j · Cited by 543
Self-citationSwails, J. M., York, D. M., & Roitberg, A. E. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct401042b · Cited by 268
The role of protonation states in ligand-receptor recognition and binding.
Petukh, M., Stefl, S., & Alexov, E. (2013) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612811319230004 · Cited by 101
Self-citationModeling covalent-modifier drugs.
Awoonor-Williams, E., Walsh, A. G., & Rowley, C. N. (2017) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.05.009 · Cited by 90
Proteins behaving badly: emerging technologies in profiling biopharmaceutical aggregation
Hamrang, Z., Rattray, N. J. W., & Pluen, A. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.05.004 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexov, E., Mehler, E. L., Baker, N., M. Baptista, A., Huang, Y., Milletti, F., Erik Nielsen, J., Farrell, D., Carstensen, T., Olsson, M. H. M., Shen, J. K., Warwicker, J., Williams, S., & Word, J. M.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-15
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3260-3275
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2120715487
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress in the prediction of p Kavalues in proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.23189
- The paper
- Alexov, E., Mehler, E. L., Baker, N., M. Baptista, A., Huang, Y., Milletti, F., Erik Nielsen, J., Farrell, D., Carstensen, T., Olsson, M. H. M., Shen, J. K., Warwicker, J., Williams, S., & Word, J. M. (2011). Progress in the prediction of p Kavalues in proteins. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.23189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.