A novel consensus‐based computational pipeline for screening of antibody therapeutics for efficacy against SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern including Omicron variant
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) variants continue to evolve carrying flexible amino acid substitutions in the spike protein's receptor binding domain (RBD). These substitutions modify the binding of the SARS‐CoV‐2 to human angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) receptor and have been implicated in altered host fitness, transmissibility, and efficacy against antibody therapeutics and vaccines. Reliably predicting the binding strength of SARS‐CoV‐2 variants RBD to hACE2 receptor and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) can help assessing their fitness, and rapid deployment of effective antibody therapeutics, respectively. Here, we introduced a two‐step computational framework with 3‐fold validation that first identified dissociation constant as a reliable predictor of binding affinity in hetero‐ dimeric and trimeric protein complexes. The second step implements dissociation constant as descriptor of the binding strengths of SARS‐CoV‐2 variants RBD to hACE2 and NAbs. Then, we examined several variants of concerns (VOCs) such as Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron and demonstrated that these VOCs RBD bind to the hACE2 with enhanced affinity. Furthermore, the binding affinity of Omicron variant's RBD was reduced with majority of the RBD‐directed NAbs, which is highly consistent with the experimental neutralization data. By studying the atomic contacts between RBD and NAbs, we revealed the molecular footprints of four NAbs (GH‐12, P2B‐1A1, Asarnow_3D11, and C118)—that may likely neutralize the recently emerged Omicron variant—facilitating enhanced binding affinity. Finally, our findings suggest a computational pathway that could aid researchers identify a range of current NAbs that may be effective against emerging SARS‐CoV‐2 variants.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Omicron escapes the majority of existing SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies
Cao, Y., Wang, J., Jian, F., Xiao, T., Song, W., Yisimayi, A., Huang, W., Li, Q., Wang, P., An, R., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04385-3 · Cited by 2,006 · see citing works
Burley, S. K., Bhikadiya, C., Bi, C., Bittrich, S., Chen, L., Crichlow, G. V., Christie, C. H., Dalenberg, K., Di Costanzo, L., Duarte, J. M., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1038 · Cited by 1,581 · see citing works
Greaney, A. J., Loes, A. N., Crawford, K. H. D., Starr, T. N., Malone, K. D., Chu, H. Y., & Bloom, J. D. (2021) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2021.02.003 · Cited by 1,178 · see citing works
Steffen, T. L., Stone, E. T., Hassert, M., Geerling, E., Grimberg, B. T., Espino, A. M., Pantoja, P., Climent, C., Hoft, D. F., George, S. L., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.21.261727 · Cited by 25 · cited 1× · see citing works
“43 These NAbs targeting the RBD or NTD of the spike protein offer protections by inhibiting the attachment of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to ACE2 receptor on the target cells.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Kumar, N., Kaushik, R., Zhang, K. Y. J., Uversky, V. N., Sahu, U., Sood, R., & Bhatia, S.
- Affiliations
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN)
- Technology Innovation Institute (AE)
- RIKEN (JP)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- National Institute of High Security Animal Diseases (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kumar, Naveen
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-01-16
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 798-806
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W4315620788
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H02395)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, Omicron variant, spike protein receptor-binding domain, therapeutic antibodies, neutralizing antibodies, dissociation constant, binding affinity prediction, antibody screening
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Consensus, Antibodies, Neutralizing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review