Breaking the conformational ensemble barrier: Ensemble structure modeling challenges in CASP15
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
For the first time, the 2022 CASP (Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) community experiment included a section on computing multiple conformations for protein and RNA structures. There was full or partial success in reproducing the ensembles for four of the nine targets, an encouraging result. For protein structures, enhanced sampling with variations of the AlphaFold2 deep learning method was by far the most effective approach. One substantial conformational change caused by a single mutation across a complex interface was accurately reproduced. In two other assembly modeling cases, methods succeeded in sampling conformations near to the experimental ones even though environmental factors were not included in the calculations. An experimentally derived flexibility ensemble allowed a single accurate RNA structure model to be identified. Difficulties included how to handle sparse or low‐resolution experimental data and the current lack of effective methods for modeling RNA/protein complexes. However, these and other obstacles appear addressable.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Kryshtafovych, A., Montelione, G. T., Rigden, D. J., Mesdaghi, S., Karaca, E., & Moult, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
- Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moult, John
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-10-23
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1903-1911
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- PMC
- PMC10840738
- OpenAlex
- W4387893024
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S007105/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- conformational ensembles, CASP15, AlphaFold2, enhanced sampling, protein structure prediction, RNA structure prediction, protein-RNA complex, protein-protein complex, protein flexibility
- MeSH terms
- Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, RNA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review