Cited by 3Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Flattening the curve—How to get better results with small deep‐mutational‐scanning datasets

Open access
Wirnsberger, Gregor, Pritišanac, Iva, Oberdorfer, Gustav, Gruber, Karl·2024·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Proteins are used in various biotechnological applications, often requiring the optimization of protein properties by introducing specific amino‐acid exchanges. Deep mutational scanning (DMS) is an effective high‐throughput method for evaluating the effects of these exchanges on protein function. DMS data can then inform the training of a neural network to predict the impact of mutations. Most approaches use some representation of the protein sequence for training and prediction. As proteins are characterized by complex structures and intricate residue interaction networks, directly providing structural information as input reduces the need to learn these features from the data. We introduce a method for encoding protein structures as stacked 2D contact maps, which capture residue interactions, their evolutionary conservation, and mutation‐induced interaction changes. Furthermore, we explored techniques to augment neural network training performance on smaller DMS datasets. To validate our approach, we trained three neural network architectures originally used for image analysis on three DMS datasets, and we compared their performances with networks trained solely on protein sequences. The results confirm the effectiveness of the protein structure encoding in machine learning efforts on DMS data. Using structural representations as direct input to the networks, along with data augmentation and pretraining, significantly reduced demands on training data size and improved prediction performance, especially on smaller datasets, while performance on large datasets was on par with state‐of‐the‐art sequence convolutional neural networks. The methods presented here have the potential to provide the same workflow as DMS without the experimental and financial burden of testing thousands of mutants. Additionally, we present an open‐source, user‐friendly software tool to make these data analysis techniques accessible, particularly to biotechnology and protein engineering researchers who wish to apply them to their mutagenesis data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.26686

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wirnsberger, G., Pritišanac, I., Oberdorfer, G., & Gruber, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Graz University of Technology (AT)
Corresponding author
Gruber, Karl
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-03-19
Volume
92
Issue
7
Pages
886-902
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W4392955080
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund
  • Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
deep mutational scanning, residue interaction networks, mutation effect prediction, limited training data, data augmentation, pre-training, protein engineering, protein function prediction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review