Cited by 4Protein Structure and Dynamicsvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Towards a Greener AlphaFold2 Protocol for Antibody–Antigen Modeling: Insights From CAPRI Round 55

Open access
Savaş, Büşra, Yılmazbilek, İrem, Özsan, Atakan, Karaca, Ezgi·2026·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In the 55th round of CAPRI, we used enhanced AlphaFold2 (AF2) sampling and data‐driven docking. Our AF2 protocol relies on Wallner's massive sampling approach, which combines different AF2 versions and sampling parameters to produce thousands of models per target. For T231 (an antibody‐peptide complex) and T232 (PP2A:TIPRL complex), we employed a 50‐fold reduced MinnieFold sampling and a custom ranking approach, leading to a top‐ranking medium prediction in both cases. For T233 and T234 (two antibody bound MHC I complexes), we followed data‐driven docking, which did not lead to an acceptable model. Our post‐CAPRI55 analysis showed that if we had used our MinnieFold approach on T233 and T234, we could have submitted a medium‐quality model for T233 as well. In the scoring challenge, we utilized the scoring function of FoldX, which was effective in selecting acceptable models for T231 and medium‐quality models for T232. Our success, especially in predicting and ranking a medium‐quality model for T231 and potentially for T233, underscores the feasibility of green and accurate enhanced AF2 sampling in antibody complex prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.26820

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Savaş, B., Yılmazbilek, İ., Özsan, A., & Karaca, E.
Affiliations
  • Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
  • Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center (TR)
Corresponding author
Karaca, Ezgi
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-03-03
Volume
94
Issue
11
Pages
1851-1857
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W4408161620
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Molecular Biology Organization
  • Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
AlphaFold2, enhanced sampling, antibody-peptide complex, model ranking
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Software, Computational Biology, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review