The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu‐Zn superoxide dismutase: Effects of ionic strength and amino‐acid modification
Abstract
In this paper we report the implementation of a finite‐difference algorithm which solves the linearized Poisson‐Boltzmann equation for molecules of arbitrary shape and charge distribution and which includes the screening effects of electrolytes. The microcoding of the algorithm on an ST‐100 array processor allows us to obtain electrostatic potential maps in and around a protein, including the effects of ionic strength, in about 30 minutes. We have applied the algorithm to a dimer of the protein Cu‐Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) and compared our results to those obtained from uniform dielectric models based on coulombic potentials. We find that both the shape of the protein‐solvent boundary and the ionic strength of the solvent have a profound effect on the potentials in the solvent. For the case of SOD, the cluster of positive charge at the bottom of the active site channel produces a strongly enhanced positive potential due to the focusing of field lines in the channel—a result that cannot be obtained with any uniform dielectric model. The remainder of the protein is surrounded by a weak negative potential. The electrostatic potential of the enzyme seems designed to provide a large cross‐sectional area for productive collisions. Based on the ionic strength dependence of the size of the positive potential region emanating from the active site and the repulsive negative potential barrier surrounding the protein, we are able to suggest an explanation for the ionic strength dependence of the activity of the native and chemically modified forms of the enzyme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrostatic recognition between superoxide and copper, zinc superoxide dismutase
Getzoff, E. D., Tainer, J. A., Weiner, P. K., Kollman, P. A., Richardson, J. S., & Richardson, D. C. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/306287a0 · Cited by 554
Electrostatic interactions in the reaction mechanism of bovine erythrocyte superoxide dismutase
Cudd, A., & Fridovich, I. (1982) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)33779-7 · Cited by 211
Cited by
Lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis: The role of GSH and GPx4
Ursini, F., & Maiorino, M. (2020) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.02.027 · Cited by 1,954
Massova, I., & Kollman, P. A. (2000) · Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design · doi:10.1023/a:1008763014207 · Cited by 1,015
Structure and function of cytochromes P450: a comparative analysis of three crystal structures
Hasemann, C. A., Kurumbail, R. G., Boddupalli, S. S., Peterson, J. A., & Deisenhofer, J. (1995) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00134-4 · Cited by 692
Fisher, C. L., Cabelli, D. E., Tainer, J. A., Hallewell, R. A., & Getzoff, E. D. (1994) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340190105 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Klapper, I., Hagstrom, R., Fine, R., Sharp, K., & Honig, B.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-59
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2125323855
- Cited by
- 757
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.