The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutant forms of staphylococcal nuclease with altered patterns of guanidine hydrochloride and urea denaturation
Abstract
Eleven mutant forms of staphylococcal nuclease with one or more defined amino acid substitutions have been analyzed by solvent denaturation by using intrinsic fluorescence to follow the denaturation reaction. On the basis of patterns observed in the value of m–the rate of change of log K app (the apparent equilibrium constant between the native and denatured states) with denaturant concentration—these proteins can be grouped into two classes. For class I mutants, the value of m with guanidine hydrochloride is less than the wild‐type value and is either constant or increases slightly with increasing denaturant; the value of m with urea is also less than wild type but shows a marked increase with increasing denaturant concentration, often approaching but never exceeding the wild‐type value. For class II mutants, m is constant and is greater than wild type in both denaturants, with the increase being consistently larger in guanidine hydrochloride than in urea. When double or triple mutants are constructed from members of the same mutant class, the change in m is usually the sum of the changes produced by each mutation in isolation. One plausible explanation for these altered patterns of denaturation is that chain‐chain or chain‐solvent interactions in the denatured state have been modified—interactions which appear to involve hydrophobic groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains
Anfinsen, C. B. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · Cited by 7,096
Cited by
Large shifts in pK a values of lysine residues buried inside a protein
Isom, D. G., Castañeda, C. A., Cannon, B. R., & García-Moreno E., B. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010750108 · Cited by 466
Structured disorder and conformational selection
Tsai, C., Ma, B., Sham, Y. Y., Kumar, S., & Nussinov, R. (2001) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.1107 · Cited by 202
Calculation of Protein Folding Thermodynamics Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations
(2023) · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01107 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Shortle, D., & Meeker, A. K.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-89
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2171414493
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutant forms of staphylococcal nuclease with altered patterns of guanidine hydrochloride and urea denaturation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.340010113
- The paper
- Shortle, D., & Meeker, A. K. (1986). Mutant forms of staphylococcal nuclease with altered patterns of guanidine hydrochloride and urea denaturation. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340010113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.