Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluoride inhibition of yeast enolase: Crystal structure of the enolase–Mg2+–F−–Pi complex at 2.6 Å resolution

Lebioda, Lukasz, Zhang, Erli, Lewinski, Krzysztof, Brewer, John M.·1993·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Enolase in the presence of its physiological cofactor Mg 2+ is inhibited by fluoride and phosphate ions in a strongly cooperative manner (Nowak, T, Maurer, P. Biochemistry 20:6901, 1981). The structure of the quaternary complex yeast enolase–Mg 2+–F−–P i has been determined by X‐ray diffraction and refined to an R = 16.9% for those data with F/σ(F) ≥ 3 to 2.6 Å resolution with a good geometry of the model. The movable loops of Pro‐35‐Ala‐45, Val‐153‐Phe‐lo9, and Asp‐255‐Asn‐266 are in the closed conformation found previously in the precatalytic substrate–enzyme complex. Calculations of molecular electrostatic potential show that this conformation stabilizes binding of negatively charged ligands at the Mg 2+ ion more strongly than the open conformation observed in the native enolase. This closed conformation is complementary to the transition state, which also has a negatively charged ion, hydroxide, at Mg 2+. The synergism of inhibition by F− and P i most probably is due to the requirement of P i, for the closed conformation. It is possible that other Mg 2+‐dependent enzymes that have OH− ions bound to the metalion in the transition state also will be inhibited by fluoride ions. © Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.340160302

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1021/bi00527a025 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.59.1.216 · DOI
  3. 10.3109/10409238109108702 · DOI
  4. Warburg O., 1941, Isolierung und Kristallisation des Garungsferments Enolase, Biochem. Z., 310, 384
  5. 10.1177/00220345900690060401 · DOI
  6. 10.1159/000259782 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0003-9861(70)90002-0 · DOI
  8. Wang T., 1974, Kinetics of the rabbit muscle enolase catalyzed dehydration of 2‐phosphoglycerate, J. Biol. Chem., 249, 3895, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42559-3 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/bi00261a017 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0006-291X(82)91146-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/bi00527a024 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lebioda L., 1989, The structure of yeast enolase at 2.25‐Å resolution, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 3685, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84906-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90023-F · DOI
  14. 10.1021/ja00204a030 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/bi00225a012 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/bi00225a013 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90439-X · DOI
  18. 10.1107/S0021889891011342 · DOI
  19. 10.1107/S002188989000098X · DOI
  20. Hendrickson W. A., 1980, Biomolecular Structure, Function, Conformation, and Evolution, 43
  21. 10.1002/prot.340010109 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/330084a0 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/jcc.540070216 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-X · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0162-0134(83)85030-2 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/bi00636a023 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Lebioda, L., Zhang, E., Lewinski, K., & Brewer, J. M.
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-07
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
219-225
ISSN
  • 0887-3585
  • 1097-0134
Cited by
33
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review