The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recognition of errors in three‐dimensional structures of proteins
Abstract
A major problem in the determination of the three‐dimensional structure of proteins concerns the quality of the structural models obtained from the interpretation of experimental data. New developments in X‐ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy have acceleratedd the process of structure determination and the biological community is confronted with a steadily increasing number of experimentally determined protein folds. However, in the recent past several experimentally determined protein structures have been proven to contain major errors, indicating that in some cases the interpretation of experimental data is difficult and may yield incorrect models. Such problems can be avoided when computational methods are employed which complement experimental structure determinations. A prerequisite of such computational tools is that they are independent of the parameters obtained from a particular experiment. In addition such techniques are able to support and accelerate experimental structure determinations. Here we present techniques based on knowledge based mean fields which can be used to judge the quality of protein folds. The methods can be used to identify misfolded structures as well as faulty parts of structural models. The techniques are even applicable in cases where only the C α trace of a protein conformation is available. The capabilities of the technique are demonstrated using correct and incorrect protein folds. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wiederstein, M., & Sippl, M. J. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm290 · Cited by 5,909
Self-citationComparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes
Martí-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Šali, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · Cited by 3,169
Modeling of loops in protein structures
Fiser, A., Do, R. K. G., & Šali, A. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.9.1753 · Cited by 2,116
Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by M ODELLER
Šali, A., Potterton, L., Yuan, F., van Vlijmen, H., & Karplus, M. (1995) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340230306 · Cited by 1,085
Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2002) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.0217002 · Cited by 902
Metadata
- Authors
- Sippl, M. J.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 355-362
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2106154817
- Cited by
- 2,142
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognition of errors in three‐dimensional structures of proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.340170404
- The paper
- Sippl, M. J. (1993). Recognition of errors in three‐dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340170404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.