The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protein–protein interaction at crystal contacts
Abstract
Packing contacts are crystal artifacts, yet they make use of the same forces that govern specific recognition in protein‐protein complexes and oligomeric proteins. They provide examples of a nonspecific protein‐protein interaction which can be compared to biologically relevant ones. We evaluate the number and size of pairwise interfaces in 152 crystal forms where the asymmetric unit contains a monomeric protein. In those crystal forms that have no element of 2‐fold symmetry, we find that molecules form 8 to 10 pairwise interfaces. The total area of the surface buried on each molecule is large, up to 4400 Å 2. Pairwise interfaces bury 200–1200 Å 2, like interfaces generated at random in a computer simulation, and less than interfaces in protease‐inhibitor or antigen‐antibody complexes, which bury 1500 Å 2 or more. Thus, specific contacts occurring in such complexes extend over a larger surface than nonspecific ones. In crystal forms with 2‐fold symmetry, pairwise interfaces are fewer and larger on average than in the absence of 2‐fold symmetry. Some bury 1500–2500 Å 2, like interfaces in oligomeric proteins, and create “crystal oligomers” which may have formed in the solution before crystallizing. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events
Enright, A. J., Iliopoulos, I., Kyrpides, N. C., & Ouzounis, C. A. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/47056 · Cited by 818
A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein-protein complexes
Vakser, I. A., Matar, O. G., & Lam, C. F. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.15.8477 · Cited by 180
Targeting Protein–Protein Interactions and Fragment-Based Drug Discovery
Valkov, E., Sharpe, T., Marsh, M., Greive, S., & Hyvönen, M. (2011) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2011_265 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Janin, J., & Rodier, F.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 580-587
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2124013748
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.