The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
QoI resistance emerged independently at least 4 times in European populations of Mycosphaerella graminicola
Abstract
BACKGROUND: QoI fungicides or quinone outside inhibitors (also called strobilurins) have been widely used to control agriculturally important fungal pathogens since their introduction in 1996. Strobilurins block the respiration pathway by inhibiting the cytochrome bc1 complex in mitochondria. Several plant pathogenic fungi have developed field resistance. The first QoI resistance in Mycosphaerella graminicola (Fuckel) Schroter was detected retrospectively in UK in 2001 at a low frequency in QoI‐treated plots. During the following seasons, resistance reached high frequencies across northern Europe. The aim of this study was to identify the main evolutionary forces driving the rapid emergence and spread of QoI resistance in M. graminicola populations. RESULTS: The G143A mutation causing QoI resistance was first detected during 2002 in all tested populations and in eight distinct mtDNA sequence haplotypes. By 2004, 24 different mtDNA haplotypes contained the G143A mutation. Phylogenetic analysis showed that strobilurin resistance was acquired independently through at least four recurrent mutations at the same site of cytochrome b. Estimates of directional migration rates showed that the majority of gene flow in Europe had occurred in a west‐to‐east direction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that recurring mutations independently introduced the QoI resistance allele into different genetic and geographic backgrounds. The resistant haplotypes then increased in frequency owing to the strong fungicide selection and spread eastward through wind dispersal of ascospores. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elard, L., Comes, A. M., & Humbert, J. F. (1996) · Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology · doi:10.1016/0166-6851(96)02664-3 · Cited by 98
Cited by
The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance
Hawkins, N. J., Bass, C., Dixon, A., & Neve, P. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12440 · Cited by 836
Sierotzki, H., & Scalliet, G. (2013) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto-01-13-0009-rvw · Cited by 564
Self-citationThe impact of Septoria tritici Blotch disease on wheat: An EU perspective
Fones, H., & Gurr, S. (2015) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.004 · Cited by 516
Bolnick, D. I., Barrett, R. D. H., Oke, K. B., Rennison, D. J., & Stuart, Y. E. (2018) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062240 · Cited by 328
Saintenac, C., Lee, W.-S., Cambon, F., Rudd, J. J., King, R. C., Marande, W., Powers, S. J., Bergès, H., Phillips, A. L., Uauy, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0051-x · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Torriani, S. F., Brunner, P. C., McDonald, B. A., & Sierotzki, H.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-02
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-162
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2104021702
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QoI resistance emerged independently at least 4 times in European populations of Mycosphaerella graminicola. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.1662
- The paper
- Torriani, S. F., Brunner, P. C., McDonald, B. A., & Sierotzki, H. (2009). QoI resistance emerged independently at least 4 times in European populations of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1662
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.