Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Brodifacoum is effective against Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a tyrosine139cysteine focus of anticoagulant resistance in Westphalia, Germany

Buckle, Alan P, Klemann, Nicole, Prescott, Colin V·2012·Pest Management Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The tyrosine to cysteine amino acid substitution at location 139 of the vkorc1 protein (i.e. tyrosine139cysteine or Y139C) is the most widespread anticoagulant resistance mutation in Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus Berk.) in Europe. Field trials were conducted to determine the incidence of the Y139C mutation at two rat‐infested farms in Westphalia, Germany, and to estimate the practical efficacy against them of applications, using a pulsed baiting treatment regime, of a proprietary bait (Klerat™) containing 0.005% brodifacoum. RESULTS: DNA analysis for the Y139C mutation showed that resistant rats were prevalent at the two farms, with an incidence of 80.0 and 78.6% respectively. Applications of brodifacoum bait achieved results of 99.2 and 100.0% control at the two farms, when measured by census baiting, although the treatment was somewhat prolonged at one site, possibly owing to the abundance of attractive alternative food. CONCLUSION: The study showed that 0.005% brodifacoum bait is fully effective against Norway rats possessing the Y139C mutation at the Münsterland focus and is likely to be so elsewhere in Europe where this mutation is found. The pulsed baiting regime reduced to relatively low levels the quantity of bait required to control these two substantial resistant Norway rat infestations. Previous studies had shown much larger quantities of bromadiolone and difenacoum baits used in largely ineffective treatments against Y139C resistant rats in the Münsterland. These results should be considered when making decisions about the use of anticoagulants against resistant Norway rats and their potential environmental impacts. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ps.3352

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1002/ps.1869 · doi:10.1002/ps.1869
  2. Clarke DJ, 2011, Investigation of the current status of anticoagulant resistance in UK Norway rats by VKORC1 genotyping, in 8th European Vertebrate Pest Management Conference, Berlin, Germany, 26–30 September 2011, ed. by Jacob J and Esther A, Julius‐Kühn‐Arch, 432, 63
  3. 10.1002/ps.2268 · doi:10.1002/ps.2268
  4. 10.1002/ps.2254 · doi:10.1002/ps.2254
  5. Buckle AP, 2012, Anticoagulant resistance in the UK and a new guideline for the management of resistant infestations of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus Berk.), Pest Manag Sci, 3009
  6. 10.1534/genetics.104.040360 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Baert K, 2012, Distribution of anticoagulant resistance in the brown rat in Belgium, Belg. J. Zool., 142, 39, 10.26496/bjz.2012.135 · doi:10.26496/bjz.2012.135
  8. van der LeeTA van HoofJRA BrouwerGandMeerburgBG Ontwikkeling en toepassing van een snelle diagnostische test voor resistentie van de bruine rat tegen rodenticiden. Wageningen UR Livestock Research Wageningen The Netherlands pp.1–19(2011).
  9. RostS PelzH‐J MenzelS MacNicollAD LeónV SongK‐J JäkelT OldenburgJandMullerCR. Novel mutations in the VKORC1 gene of wild rats and mice—a response to 50 years of selection pressure by warfarin?BMC Genetics10:4 pp.1–9(2009). · DOI
  10. 10.1002/ps.2780430110 · doi:10.1002/ps.2780430110
  11. 10.1038/253275a0 · doi:10.1038/253275a0
  12. 10.1080/09670870701245249 · doi:10.1080/09670870701245249
  13. 10.1017/S0022172400053419 · doi:10.1017/s0022172400053419
  14. 10.1017/S0022172400070820 · doi:10.1017/s0022172400070820
  15. 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1988.tb00368.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2338.1988.tb00368.x
  16. 10.1080/09670870701469872 · doi:10.1080/09670870701469872
  17. Nematicides rodenticides side effects others inEfficacy Evaluation of Plant Protection Products—EPPO Standards (PP1). Vol. 5.European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization OEPP/EPPO Paris France (2005).
  18. 10.1093/nar/29.17.e88 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1080/09670874.2010.537793 · doi:10.1080/09670874.2010.537793
  20. Lodal J, 2001, Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management. II, 139
  21. Burn AJ, 2002, The threat to birds of prey in the UK from second‐generation rodenticides, Aspect Appl Biol, 67, 1
  22. Buckle AP, 1994, Rodent Pests and their Control, 127
  23. Daniells L, 2011, Resistance as a factor in environmental exposure of anticoagulant rodenticides—a modelling approach, in 8th European Vertebrate Pest Management Conference, Berlin, Germany, 26–30 September 2011, ed. by Jacob J and Esther A, Julius‐Kühn‐Arch, 432, 58
  24. 10.1016/0261-2194(92)90073-E · doi:10.1016/0261-2194(92)90073-e
  25. Pelz H‐J, 2004, Rat control strategies in organic pig and poultry production with special reference to rodenticide resistance and feeding behaviour, NJAS, 52, 172
  26. 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.06.009 · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2011.06.009
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01543.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01543.x

Cited by

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Buckle, A. P., Klemann, N., & Prescott, C. V.
Venue
Pest Management Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
68
Issue
12
Pages
1579-1585
ISSN
  • 1526-498X
  • 1526-4998
Cited by
26
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brodifacoum is effective against Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a tyrosine139cysteine focus of anticoagulant resistance in Westphalia, Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.3352
The paper
Buckle, A. P., Klemann, N., & Prescott, C. V. (2012). Brodifacoum is effective against Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a tyrosine139cysteine focus of anticoagulant resistance in Westphalia, Germany. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3352

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.