Cited by 28Insect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorInsect and Pesticide ResearchInsect Pest Control Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism of leaf‐cutting ant colony suppression by fipronil used in attractive toxic baits

Open access
Gandra, Lailla C, Amaral, Karina D, Couceiro, Joel C, Della Lucia, Terezinha MC, Guedes, Raul NC·2016·Pest Management Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attractive toxic baits are the prevailing method for managing leaf‐cutting ants in the eucalypt forests planted for the production of pulp, paper, timber and charcoal. For successful use in these baits, the insecticidal compounds need to circumvent the typical defences of the eusocial leaf‐cutting ants. The challenge is to have an insecticide in the bait that will not directly harm and/or compromise foraging workers, but that will eventually suppress the colony. These underlying mechanisms are poorly known, and here the potential mechanism of fipronil activity in toxic baits for leaf‐cutting ants was assessed using colonies of the representative Neotropical Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus (Forel, 1893). RESULTS: Although forager activity was not directly impaired by fipronil, the insecticide affected forager nestmate interactions (auto‐ and allogrooming) and waste removal and, more importantly, greatly affected the minor workers, impairing their activities of fungus garden cultivation and progeny handling. The fast decay of the fungus garden compromised the sustainability of the colonies, ultimately leading to their demise within 8 days. CONCLUSION: The behavioural effects of sublethal insecticide exposure towards minor workers are the main determinants of insecticide activity as ant baits and should be targeted in developing such compounds. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ps.4239

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1007/BF01868306 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-3-662-05259-4 · DOI
  3. Della Lucia TMC, 2011, Formigas‐Cortadeiras – da Biologia ao Manejo, Vol. 1, 13
  4. 10.1002/ps.3660 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00071.x · DOI
  6. 10.1080/09670874.2012.663946 · DOI
  7. Mora AL, 2000, Eucalypt Cultivation in Brazil
  8. 2013, Anuário Estatístico ABRAF 2013
  9. Oliveira MA, 2011, Formigas‐Cortadeiras – da Biologia ao Manejo, Vol. 1, 400
  10. Isenring R, 2010, Recommendations Regarding Derogations to Use Alpha‐Cypermethrin, Deltamethrin, Fenitrothion, Fipronil and Sulfluramid in FSC Certified Forests in Brazil
  11. Souza LF, 1962, As formigas cortadeiras e o seu combate por meio de iscas granuladas, Bol Campo, 18, 5
  12. Della Lucia TMC, 1993, As Formigas Cortadeiras, 163
  13. Boareto MAC, 1997, Perspectiva no controle de formigas‐cortadeiras, Ser Tecn IPEF, 11, 31
  14. Gallo D, 1988, Manual de Entomologia Agrícola
  15. Della Lucia TMC, 2000, Manejo Integrado – Doenças, Pragas e Plantas Daninhas, 245
  16. 10.1146/annurev-ent-010715-023646 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/1526-4998(200012)56:12<1059::AID-PS246>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  18. Antunes EC, 2005, Abamectin‐driven alterations on queen ovaries of the leaf‐cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Sociobiology, 45, 163
  19. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00338.x · DOI
  20. 10.1017/S0007485308005786 · DOI
  21. Marinho CGS, 2006, Aggressive response of pest ant species to β‐eudesmol (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Sociobiology, 47, 445
  22. Tingle CC, 2003, Fipronil: environmental fate, ecotoxicology, and human health concerns, Rev Environ Contam Toxicol, 176, 1
  23. Salgado VL, 2012, Modern Crop Protection Compounds, vol. 3, 1283
  24. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153645 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11356-014-3471-x · DOI
  26. Delabie JHC, 2011, Distribuição das formigas‐cortadeiras dos gêneros Acromyrmex e Atta no Novo Mundo, Formigas‐Cortadeiras – da Biologia ao Manejo, Vol. 1, 80
  27. Della Lucia TMC, 1993, As Formigas Cortadeiras, 151
  28. Antunes EC, 1999, Consumo foliar em Eucalyptus urophylla por Acromyrmex laticeps nigrosetosus Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Ciênc. Agrotec, 23, 208
  29. 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7998 · DOI
  30. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12036.x · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s11046-007-9009-8 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10905-012-9328-6 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.01066.x · DOI
  34. Diehl‐Fleig E, 1993, Efficiency of Beauveria bassiana for Acromyrmex spp. control (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Ann Soc Entomol Brasil, 22, 233

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Gandra, L. C., Amaral, K. D., Couceiro, J. C., Della Lucia, T. M., & Guedes, R. N.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
  • Departamento de Entomologia Universidade Federal de Viçosa Viçosa MG Brazil
  • Departamento de Biologia Animal Universidade Federal de Viçosa Viçosa MG Brazil
Corresponding author
Guedes, Raul NC
Venue
Pest Management Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
72
Issue
8
Pages
1475-1481
ISSN
  • 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4998
OpenAlex
W2289775364
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pest Management Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the CAPES Foundation (Brazilian Ministry of Education) and the Minas Gerais State Foundation of Research Aid (FAPEMIG).
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
fipronil, leaf-cutting ants, Acromyrmex subterraneus, sublethal insecticide effects, minor worker, eucalypt forest
MeSH terms
Animals, Ants, Behavior, Animal, Female, Fertility, Fungi, Insecticides, Pyrazoles, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review